Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Muhammad a a vs State of Kerala

Muhammad a a vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Feb 06, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1277030

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/43054/2023
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Muhammad a a

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice dinesh kumar singh wednesday, the 24th day of july 2024 / 2nd sravana, 1946 petitioner/s: muhammad a a aged 56 years s/o alavi a k, anikallingal house, kattikulam (p.o.), wayanad, pin - 670646 by adv nidhi balachandran respondent/s:1 state of kerala represented by secretary to government, department of transport, secretariat, thiruvananthapuram, pin - 2 regional transport authority mananthavady represented by it's secretary, wayanad, 3 the assistant regional transport officer sub regional transport office, mananthavady, wayanad, 4 sub inspector of police thirunelli police station, wayanad, pin - 670646 5 thirunelly grama panchayat represented by it's secretary, wayanad, pin - 670646 by adv k.s.arun kumarthis writ petition (civil) having come up for admission on 24.07.2024, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentthis matter was called on the first call and in revised call as well. neither in the first call nor in the revised call, anyone has appeared to represent the matter. in view thereof, it appears that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the writ petition, which is hereby dismissed for non- prosecution. sd/- dinesh kumar singh judge nsd appendix of wp(c) 43054/2023 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the permit dated 20/6/23 issued by the 2nd respondent to the petitioner exhibit p2 true copy of the representation dated 21/6/23 submitted by the petitioner before the 5th respondent exhibit p3 true copy of the receipt issued by the 4th respondent dated 4/10/23 on submission of the complaint

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JULY 2024 / 2ND SRAVANA, 1946 PETITIONER/S: MUHAMMAD A A AGED 56 YEARS S/O ALAVI A K, ANIKALLINGAL HOUSE, KATTIKULAM (P.O.), WAYANAD, PIN - 670646 BY ADV NIDHI BALACHANDRAN RESPONDENT/S:

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 2 REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY MANANTHAVADY REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY, WAYANAD, 3 THE ASSISTANT REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER SUB REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE, MANANTHAVADY, WAYANAD, 4 SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THIRUNELLI POLICE STATION, WAYANAD, PIN - 670646 5 THIRUNELLY GRAMA PANCHAYAT REPRESENTED BY IT'S SECRETARY, WAYANAD, PIN - 670646 BY ADV K.S.ARUN KUMAR

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.07.2024, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

This matter was called on the first call and in revised call as well. Neither in the first call nor in the revised call, anyone has appeared to represent the matter. In view thereof, it appears that the petitioner has no interest in prosecuting the writ petition, which is hereby dismissed for non- prosecution. sd/- DINESH KUMAR SINGH JUDGE Nsd APPENDIX OF WP(C) 43054/2023 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE PERMIT DATED 20/6/23 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 21/6/23 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 5TH RESPONDENT Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT DATED 4/10/23 ON SUBMISSION OF THE COMPLAINT

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial