The Divisional Controller, vs Shivayya Aliyas Shivakka W/O Holebasayya Aliyas Basayya Emmi

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Dharwad Decided Nov 25, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1276544

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1276544
Court: Karnataka Dharwad High Court
Judge: M.Nagaprasanna
Decided On: Nov 25, 2025
Case Number: WP/107888/2025
Subject: Arbitration

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Arbitration

Key legal issue: Arbitration

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The Divisional Controller,

Respondent

Shivayya Aliyas Shivakka W/O Holebasayya Aliyas Basayya Emmi

Excerpt

-1- in the high court of karnataka,at dharwad dated this the 25th day of november, 2025 before the hon'ble mr. justice m.nagaprasanna writ petition no. 107888 of 2025 (gm-ac) between: the divisional controller, nwkrtc, navanagar, bagalkot - 587 103. (judgment debtor before executing court) …petitioner (by sri. lingraj maradi, advocate) and: shivayya @ shivakka w/o. holebasayya @ basayya emmi, since deceased by his lrs1. mahantesh @ mahantayya s/o. holebasayya @ basayya emmi, age. 38 years, occ. agriculture.2. sangayya s/o. holebasayya @ basayya emmi,age: 34 years, occ: agriculture, vishal both are r/o: shirur, ningappa pattihal tq: dist. bagalkote - 587 103 digitally signed by vishal ningappa decree holeder before the executing court pattihal location: high court of karnataka dharwad bench date: 2025.12.02 11:53:20 …respondents +0530this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the order dated 23.08.2025 in e.p.no.199/2024 passed by the prl. senior civil judge and cjm, bagalkot vide annexure-c in the interest of justice and equity and etc.,this writ petition, coming on for preliminary hearing this day, order was made therein as under: -2-oral order(per: the hon'ble mr. justice m.nagaprasanna)1. the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has been rendered infructuous.2. in the light of the submission so made, petition is disposed as having become infructuous. sd/- (m.nagaprasanna) judge kgk/ct-asc list no.: 1 sl no.: 37

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 107888 OF 2025 (GM-AC) BETWEEN: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, NWKRTC, NAVANAGAR, BAGALKOT - 587 103. (JUDGMENT DEBTOR BEFORE EXECUTING COURT) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. LINGRAJ MARADI, ADVOCATE) AND: SHIVAYYA @ SHIVAKKA W/O. HOLEBASAYYA @ BASAYYA EMMI, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
1. MAHANTESH @ MAHANTAYYA S/O. HOLEBASAYYA @ BASAYYA EMMI, AGE. 38 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE.
2. SANGAYYA S/O. HOLEBASAYYA @ BASAYYA EMMI,

AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, VISHAL BOTH ARE R/O: SHIRUR, NINGAPPA PATTIHAL TQ: DIST. BAGALKOTE - 587 103 Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA DECREE HOLEDER BEFORE THE EXECUTING COURT PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.12.02 11:53:20 …RESPONDENTS +0530

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 23.08.2025 IN E.P.NO.199/2024 PASSED BY THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, BAGALKOT VIDE ANNEXURE-C IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC.,

THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: -2-

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)

1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has been rendered infructuous.

2. In the light of the submission so made, petition is disposed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE KGK/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37

Same Court & Year Karnataka Dharwad · 2025 Same Parties The Divisional Controller, vs Shivayya Aliyas Shivakka W/O Ho... Same Subject Arbitration Same Judge M.Nagaprasanna