Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Union of India vs Arun Kumar and Anr

Union of India vs Arun Kumar and Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Apr 30, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1276476

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
LA.APP./326/2017
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Union of India

Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd. Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil

Respondent

Arun Kumar and Anr

Excerpt

$~j-85* in the high court of delhi at new delhi% reserved on : 16.12.2025pronounced on : 30.04.2026+ la.app. 326/2017 union of india .....appellant through: mr. sanjay kumar pathak, standing counsel with mrs. k. k. kiran pathak, mr. sunil kumar jha, mr. mohd. sueb akhtar, mr. divakar kapil, advs.versusarun kumar and anr .....respondents through: mr.sumit bansal, sr. advocate with mr.badal dayal, mr.udaibir singh, mr.pankaj gupta, ms.tulna rampal and ms.nikita gupta, advocatescoram:hon'ble mr. justice manoj kumar ohrijudgmentfor detailed judgment, please refer to la.app. 227/2017 titled “jai kishan gupta vs. union of india & ors.” and la.app. 158/2017 titled “m/s relaxo footwears ltd. vs. union of india & ors.” manoj kumar ohri (judge) april 30, 2026/nasignature not verified signature not verified digitally signed digitally signed by:manoj by:nijamuddeen ansari kumar ohri signing date:06.05.2026 signing date:06.05.2026 19:01:14 19:01:48

Full Judgment

$~J-85

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Reserved on : 16.12.2025

Pronounced on : 30.04.2026

+ LA.APP. 326/2017 UNION OF INDIA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Standing Counsel with Mrs. K. K. Kiran Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd. Sueb Akhtar, Mr. Divakar Kapil, Advs.

versus

ARUN KUMAR AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr.Sumit Bansal, Sr. Advocate with Mr.Badal Dayal, Mr.Udaibir Singh, Mr.Pankaj Gupta, Ms.Tulna Rampal and Ms.Nikita Gupta, Advocates

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

JUDGMENT

For detailed judgment, please refer to LA.APP. 227/2017 titled “Jai Kishan Gupta Vs. Union Of India & Ors.” and LA.APP. 158/2017 titled “M/s Relaxo Footwears Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors.” MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (JUDGE) APRIL 30, 2026/na

Signature Not Verified                                                                     Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed                                                                           Digitally Signed By:MANOJ
By:NIJAMUDDEEN ANSARI                                                                      KUMAR OHRI
Signing Date:06.05.2026                                                                    Signing Date:06.05.2026
19:01:14                                                                                   19:01:48

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial