Vikram @ Baingan vs State

Vikram @ Baingan vs STATE

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Mar 30, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1276112

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1276112
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vimal Kumar Yadav
Decided On: Mar 30, 2026
Case Number: CRL.A./1444/2014
Subject: Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vikram @ Baingan

Advocate Mr. Vikas Padora, Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa

Respondent

STATE

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ crl.a. 1444/2014 vikram @ baingan .....appellant through: mr. vikas padora, adv. (dhclsc) (through v.c.). appellant-in-person.versusstate .....respondent through: mr. satinder singh bawa, app for state with si ritika dhiwan, ps chanakya puri.coram:hon'ble mr. justice vimal kumar yadavorder% 30.03.20261. hybrid mode.2. it is informed by learned app that the appellant has completed his sentence awarded to him and also paid the fine.3. therefore, in these circumstances, the appellant, who is present in person states that he does not want to pursue the appeal anymore.4. nominal roll on record dated 15.12.2025, confirms the fact of completion of sentence and payment of fine.5. in view of these facts and circumstances and the stand taken by the appellant, the appeal has become infructuous and stands disposed of. vimal kumar yadav, j march 30, 2026/akcthis is a digitally signed order. the authenticity of the order can be re-verified from delhi high court order portal by scanning the qr code shown above. the order is downloaded from the dhc server on 02/04/2026 at 11:18:23

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.A. 1444/2014 VIKRAM @ BAINGAN .....Appellant Through: Mr. Vikas Padora, Adv. (DHCLSC) (through V.C.). Appellant-in-person.
versus
STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for State with SI Ritika Dhiwan, PS Chanakya Puri.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV

ORDER

% 30.03.2026

1. Hybrid mode.

2. It is informed by learned APP that the Appellant has completed his sentence awarded to him and also paid the fine.

3. Therefore, in these circumstances, the Appellant, who is present in person states that he does not want to pursue the appeal anymore.

4. Nominal Roll on record dated 15.12.2025, confirms the fact of completion of sentence and payment of fine.

5. In view of these facts and circumstances and the stand taken by the Appellant, the appeal has become infructuous and stands disposed of. VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J MARCH 30, 2026/akc

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/04/2026 at 11:18:23

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Vikram @ Baingan vs STATE Same Subject Right to Information Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vimal Kumar Yadav