Vikram Sharma vs Monika

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Mar 10, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1275983

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1275983
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee
Decided On: Mar 10, 2026
Case Number: CRL.REV.P./638/2018
Subject: Consumer

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Consumer

Key legal issue: Consumer

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vikram Sharma

Advocate Mr. Baldev Raj, Ms. Shikha Tyagi

Respondent

Monika

Advocate Mr. Davinder Hora, Mr. Rahul Kumar

Excerpt

.....and ms. shikha tyagi, advocates.versusmonika .....respondent through: mr. davinder hora and mr. rahul kumar, advocates.coram:hon'ble mr. justice saurabh banerjeeorder% 10.03.20261. by virtue of the present petition under section 397 read withsection 401 and section 482 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973, the petitioner seeks setting aside of the order dated 27.04.2018 (impugned order) passed by the learned asj-02, west district, tis harari courts, delhi (asj) in criminal appeal no.68/2018 entitled ‘monika vs. vikram sharma’, whereby the learned asj has directed the petitioner to pay rs.15,000/- per month to the respondent as interim maintenance.2. after some arguments, learned counsels for the parties withoutadverting to the merits involved, submit that the parties are agreeable if the interim maintenance as fixed by the learned asj is reduced to rs.13,000/- per month w.e.f. 01.01.2026.3. accordingly, and since much water has flown since passing of the impugned order, the same is modified to the extent that w.e.f. 01.01.2026the petitioner shall pay an amount of rs.13,000/- to the respondent before the 5th day of each month till the final disposal of case no.5550510/2016 pending before the learned mm (mahila court-04), west district, tis hazari courts, delhi as interim maintenance. needless to say, the said amount shall be subject to adjustments as per the final outcome thereof.4. it is also clarified that the aforesaid modification is de hors the otherterms and conditions and the time period involved in the impugned order. therefore, as far as the arrears are concerned, learned counsels for the parties undertake to file a calculation sheet with respect to the amount(s) paid and/ or remaining to be paid, if any, from the date of accrual as per the impugned order, i.e. april, 2016, till 31.03.2026 before the concerned court within a period of four weeks from today.5. accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. saurabh.....

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.REV.P. 638/2018 & CRL.M.A. 28901/2018 VIKRAM SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Baldev Raj and Ms. Shikha Tyagi, Advocates.
versus
MONIKA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Davinder Hora and Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

ORDER

% 10.03.2026

1. By virtue of the present petition under Section 397 read with

Section 401 and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the petitioner seeks setting aside of the order dated 27.04.2018 (impugned order) passed by the learned ASJ-02, West District, Tis Harari Courts, Delhi (ASJ) in Criminal Appeal No.68/2018 entitled ‘Monika vs. Vikram Sharma’, whereby the learned ASJ has directed the petitioner to pay Rs.15,000/- per month to the respondent as interim maintenance.

2. After some arguments, learned counsels for the parties without

adverting to the merits involved, submit that the parties are agreeable if the interim maintenance as fixed by the learned ASJ is reduced to Rs.13,000/- per month w.e.f. 01.01.2026.

3. Accordingly, and since much water has flown since passing of the impugned order, the same is modified to the extent that w.e.f. 01.01.2026

the petitioner shall pay an amount of Rs.13,000/- to the respondent before the 5th day of each month till the final disposal of Case No.5550510/2016 pending before the learned MM (Mahila Court-04), West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi as interim maintenance. Needless to say, the said amount shall be subject to adjustments as per the final outcome thereof.

4. It is also clarified that the aforesaid modification is de hors the other

terms and conditions and the time period involved in the impugned order. Therefore, as far as the arrears are concerned, learned counsels for the parties undertake to file a calculation sheet with respect to the amount(s) paid and/ or remaining to be paid, if any, from the date of accrual as per the impugned order, i.e. April, 2016, till 31.03.2026 before the concerned Court within a period of four weeks from today.

5. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. SAURABH BANERJEE, J MARCH 10, 2026/NA

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2026 Same Parties Vikram Sharma vs Monika Same Subject Consumer Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee