Urmila vs Shanti Devi

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Apr 16, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1275924

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1275924
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma
Decided On: Apr 16, 2026
Case Number: RFA/479/2012
Subject: Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Urmila

Advocate Mr. S.N. Shukla

Respondent

Shanti Devi

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ rfa 479/2012 & cm appl. 24093/2017 urmila .....appellant through: mr. s.n. shukla, adv. through vc.versusshanti devi .....respondent through: none.coram:hon'ble mr. justice amit sharmaorder% 16.04.20261. this hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. the present appeal under section 96 read with order xli of the cpcseeks the following prayers: - “in the light of the above said facts and circumstances, it is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this hon'ble court may be graciously pleased to set aside the impugned. preliminary decree/judgment dated 04/08/2012 passed by the hon'ble adj, saket courts, delhi dr. neera bharihoke in suit no. 669/2011 titled "shanti devi vs urmila", in the interest of justice.and pass such other order(s) or further orders as this hon'ble court deems fit and proper in the facts & circumstances of the case, for which act of kindness the appellant as in duty bound shall ever pray.”3. learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal on the ground that the matter has been settled with the respondent.4. leave granted.5. the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of, accordingly.6. pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.7. order be uploaded on the website of this court, forthwith. amit sharma, j april 16, 2026/kr/sg

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ RFA 479/2012 & CM APPL. 24093/2017 URMILA .....Appellant Through: Mr. S.N. Shukla, Adv. through Vc.
versus
SHANTI DEVI .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

ORDER

% 16.04.2026

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present appeal under Section 96 read with Order XLI of the CPC

seeks the following prayers: - “In the light of the above said facts and circumstances, it is therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may be graciously pleased to set aside the impugned. preliminary decree/judgment dated 04/08/2012 passed by the Hon'ble ADJ, Saket Courts, Delhi Dr. Neera Bharihoke in Suit No. 669/2011 titled "Shanti Devi Vs Urmila", in the interest of justice.

And pass such other order(s) or further orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts & circumstances of the case, for which act of kindness the appellant as in duty bound shall ever pray.”

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant seeks leave to withdraw the present appeal on the ground that the matter has been settled with the respondent.

4. Leave granted.

5. The present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of, accordingly.

6. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

7. Order be uploaded on the website of this Court, forthwith. AMIT SHARMA, J APRIL 16, 2026/kr/sg

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2026 Same Parties Urmila vs Shanti Devi Same Subject Right to Information Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Amit Sharma