Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rani Devi vs Union of India & Ors.

Rani Devi vs Union of India & Ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Feb 27, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1274545

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P.(CRL)/4305/2025
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rani Devi

Advocate Ms. Anjali Pathak, Mr. Vikrant Nitesh Goyal, Mr. Yash Basoya, Mr. Rakshit Tyagi, Mr. Kunal Dixit, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Ms. Khyati, Mr. Sanjay Lao, Ms. Priyam Agarwal, Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya, Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Mr. Premtosh Kumar Mishra

Respondent

Union of India & Ors.

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ w.p.(crl) 4305/2025 rani devi .....petitioner through: ms. anjali pathak, advocate.versusunion of india & ors. .....respondents through: mr. vikrant nitesh goyal, mr. yash basoya, mr. rakshit tyagi, mr. kunal dixit, ms. laavanya kaushik and ms. khyati, advocates for uoi. mr. sanjay lao, standing counsel (crl) with ms. priyam agarwal, mr. abhinav kumar arya and mr. aryan sachdeva, advocates with insp. harish, si jai singh, ps-bhd nagar. mr. premtosh kumar mishra and mr. shrey sharma, advocates for cbi. missing son of the petitioner in person.coram:hon'ble mr. justice navin chawlahon'ble mr. justice ravinder dudejaorder% 27.02.2026 crl.m.a. 6714/2026 (early hearing)1. this is an application praying for the pre-ponement of the date of hearing of the captioned writ petition.2. bearing in mind the contents of the application, it is allowed.3. this application stands disposed of. w.p.(crl) 4305/20254. this is a petition under article 226 of the constitution of indiaread with section 528 of the bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023 (bnss) seeking a writ in the nature of habeas corpus, directing the respondent nos. 1 to 3 to produce the petitioner’s son.5. the missing boy has been traced and is presently appearing in person before us.6. in view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition. the same is accordingly disposed of.7. the next date of hearing i.e. 09.03.2026 stands cancelled. navin chawla, j ravinder dudeja, j february 27, 2026/vd/sk

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 4305/2025 RANI DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anjali Pathak, Advocate.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikrant Nitesh Goyal, Mr. Yash Basoya, Mr. Rakshit Tyagi, Mr. Kunal Dixit, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik and Ms. Khyati, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl) with Ms. Priyam Agarwal, Mr. Abhinav Kumar Arya and Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advocates with Insp. Harish, SI Jai Singh, PS-BHD Nagar. Mr. Premtosh Kumar Mishra and Mr. Shrey Sharma, Advocates for CBI. Missing son of the petitioner in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA

ORDER

% 27.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 6714/2026 (early hearing)

1. This is an application praying for the pre-ponement of the date of hearing of the captioned writ petition.

2. Bearing in mind the contents of the application, it is allowed.

3. This application stands disposed of. W.P.(CRL) 4305/2025

4. This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking a writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondent nos. 1 to 3 to produce the petitioner’s son.

5. The missing boy has been traced and is presently appearing in person before us.

6. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition. The same is accordingly disposed of.

7. The next date of hearing i.e. 09.03.2026 stands cancelled. NAVIN CHAWLA, J RAVINDER DUDEJA, J FEBRUARY 27, 2026/vd/sk

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial