Santosh Kumar vs Kanchan

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Feb 03, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1273752

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1273752
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vivek Chaudhary ,Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Renu Bhatnagar
Decided On: Feb 03, 2026
Case Number: MAT.APP.(F.C.)/5/2025
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Santosh Kumar

Advocate Mr. Neeraj Rathi

Respondent

Kanchan

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ mat.app.(f.c.) 5/2025, cm appl. 367/2025 & cm appl. santosh kumar .....appellant through: mr. neeraj rathi, adv. (through vc)versuskanchan .....respondent through: none.coram:hon'ble mr. justice vivek chaudharyhon'ble ms. justice renu bhatnagarorder% 03.02.20261. the present appeal has been filed under section 28(4) of the hindumarriage act, 1955 (hma) read with section 19 of the family court, 1984 assailing the order dated 11.07.2024 passed by the learned family court, north district, rohini courts, delhi in hma no. 2241 of 2022, whereby, the application under section 24 of the hma has been allowed and the appellant has been directed to pay a consolidated monthly maintenance of rs. 15,000/- per month to the respondent for herself and the minor daughter, from the date of filing of the application till further orders/during pendency of the petition.2. perusal of the record shows that the salary certificate of the appellant is on record.3. after arguing at some length, learned counsel for the appellant prays to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to contest the matter before the concerned family court.4. with the aforesaid liberty, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.5. pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.6. the file be consigned to record. vivek chaudhary, j renu bhatnagar, j february 3, 2026 rs/nc

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 5/2025, CM APPL. 367/2025 & CM APPL. SANTOSH KUMAR .....Appellant Through: Mr. Neeraj Rathi, Adv. (through VC)
versus
KANCHAN .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR

ORDER

% 03.02.2026

1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 28(4) of the Hindu

Marriage Act, 1955 (HMA) read with Section 19 of the Family Court, 1984 assailing the Order dated 11.07.2024 passed by the Learned Family Court, North District, Rohini Courts, Delhi in HMA no. 2241 of 2022, whereby, the application under Section 24 of the HMA has been allowed and the appellant has been directed to pay a consolidated monthly maintenance of Rs. 15,000/- per month to the respondent for herself and the minor daughter, from the date of filing of the application till further orders/during pendency of the petition.

2. Perusal of the record shows that the salary certificate of the appellant is on record.

3. After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the appellant prays to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to contest the matter before the concerned Family Court.

4. With the aforesaid liberty, the present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

6. The file be consigned to record. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J RENU BHATNAGAR, J FEBRUARY 3, 2026 rs/nc

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Santosh Kumar vs Kanchan Same Subject Education Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vivek Chaudhary ,Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Renu...