Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Umesh Kumar and Others vs State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.

Umesh Kumar and Others vs State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Feb 02, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1271733

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.M.C./8760/2024
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Umesh Kumar and Others

Advocate Mr. K. B. Shankar, Mr. Ghanshyam Singh

Respondent

State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.

Advocate Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, Mr. Deepak Somani, Ms. Chanchal Gupta

Excerpt

.....under sections 323/341/452/308/2. the petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this court and have been identified by their counsels and concerned investigating officer(io) from police station fatehpur beri, delhi.3. briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that petitioner and respondent no. 2 are neighbours residing in the same locality and are known to each other. it is stated that due to some misunderstanding, a quarrel hadtaken place between the parties, in which both the parties had sustained injuries. subsequently, based on a complaint filed by respondent no. 2, the present fir was registered against the petitioners for offence punishable under sections 323/341/452/308/506/509/34 of ipc. after investigation, the chargesheet was filed before the concerned court. it is stated that a cross- fir bearing no. 196/2020 was also registered against the respondent no.2 and his family members for commission of offence punishable under section 323/308/34 of ipc. it is further stated that with the intervention of respectable persons of the society and relatives of the parties, both the parties have settled all their disputes vide memorandum of understanding dated 05.03.2024.4. the learned app for the state submits that the petitioners herein have no previous involvement in any other case.5. on a query made by this court, respondent no. 2 who has beenidentified by the concerned io, have categorically stated that he has entered into compromise out of his own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat and he has no objection, if the present fir is quashed.6. in view of the above fact that the parties have amicably resolved theirdifferences of their own free will, without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. it would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned fir and the proceedings pursuant thereto. there is no legal.....

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 8760/2024 UMESH KUMAR AND OTHERS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. K. B. Shankar and Mr. Ghanshyam Singh, Advocates alongwith petitioners in person

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for the State Mr. Deepak Somani and Ms. Chanchal Gupta, Advocates for R-2 alongwith R-2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

ORDER

% 02.02.2026

1. By way of the instant petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR bearing no. 87/2020, registered at Police Station Fatehpur Beri, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 323/341/452/308/

2. The petitioners and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer

(IO) from Police Station Fatehpur Beri, Delhi.

3. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that petitioner and respondent no. 2 are neighbours residing in the same locality and are known to each other. It is stated that due to some misunderstanding, a quarrel had

taken place between the parties, in which both the parties had sustained injuries. Subsequently, based on a complaint filed by respondent no. 2, the present FIR was registered against the petitioners for offence punishable under Sections 323/341/452/308/506/509/34 of IPC. After investigation, the chargesheet was filed before the concerned Court. It is stated that a cross- FIR bearing No. 196/2020 was also registered against the respondent no.2 and his family members for commission of offence punishable under Section 323/308/34 of IPC. It is further stated that with the intervention of respectable persons of the society and relatives of the parties, both the parties have settled all their disputes vide Memorandum of Understanding dated 05.03.2024.

4. The learned APP for the State submits that the petitioners herein have no previous involvement in any other case.

5. On a query made by this Court, respondent no. 2 who has been

identified by the concerned IO, have categorically stated that he has entered into compromise out of his own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat and he has no objection, if the present FIR is quashed.

6. In view of the above fact that the parties have amicably resolved their

differences of their own free will, without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

7. Accordingly, FIR bearing no. 87/2020, registered at Police Station Fatehpur Beri, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 323/341/308/452/506/509/34 of IPC and all consequential

proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed, subject to the petitioners depositing cost of Rs.1,000/- each in the form of donating educational books to the library of a Government school situated in the vicinity of their residence, after ascertaining from the Principal/Head of the concerned school or institution the nature and requirement of books needed for the school library, so as to ensure that the books donated are relevant and beneficial to the students. The said exercise shall be completed within a period of two weeks from date and the compliance of the same shall be filed with the Registrar General of this Court.

8. In view of the above, the present petition alongwith pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

9. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 02, 2026/ns R

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial