Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sadhna vs Arvind Bhadwal

Sadhna vs Arvind Bhadwal

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Mar 30, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1271684

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MAT.APP.(F.C.)/361/2024
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sadhna

Respondent

Arvind Bhadwal

Excerpt

* in thehigh courtof delhiat new delhi + mat.app.(f.c.) 361/2024 &cm appl. 64748/2024 sadhna .....appellant through: none.versusarvind bhadwal .....respondent through: none.coram:hon'ble mr. justice vivek chaudharyhon'ble ms. justice renu bhatnagarorder% 30.03.20261. none appears for the parties despite the matter being passed over.2. a perusal of the record further reveals that none has been appearing for the parties since 30.04.2025.3. in view of the aforesaid, it appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present appeal. accordingly, the same is dismissed in default. pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. vivek chaudhary, j renu bhatnagar, j march 30, 2026 p/smthis is a digitally signed order. the authenticity of the order can be re-verified from delhi high court order portal by scanning the qr code shown above. the order is downloaded from the dhc server on 06/04/2026 at 10:56:29

Full Judgment

* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 361/2024 &CM APPL. 64748/2024 SADHNA .....Appellant Through: None.

versus

ARVIND BHADWAL .....Respondent Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIVEK CHAUDHARY

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR

ORDER

% 30.03.2026

1. None appears for the parties despite the matter being passed over.

2. A perusal of the record further reveals that none has been appearing for the parties since 30.04.2025.

3. In view of the aforesaid, it appears that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the present appeal. Accordingly, the same is dismissed in default. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. VIVEK CHAUDHARY, J RENU BHATNAGAR, J MARCH 30, 2026 p/sm

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 10:56:29

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial