Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Miss a vs State and Another

MISS A vs State and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided May 04, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1269781

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.M.C./2191/2022
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

MISS A

Advocate Mr. Harshit Jain, Mr. Deepak Yadav

Respondent

State and Another

Advocate Mr. Satish Kumar, Mr. Dinesh Kr, Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Ms. Divya Bakshi, Ms. Sakshi Sachdeva

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ crl.m.c. 2191/2022, crl.m.a. 9272/2022 miss a .....petitioner through: mr. harshit jain and mr. deepak yadav, advs.versusstate and another .....respondents through: mr. satish kumar app for state with mr. dinesh kr., ms. upasna bakshi and ms. divya bakshi, advs with si priyanka, ps: north rohini ms. sakshi sachdeva, adv. for respondent no.2 (through vc)coram:hon'ble mr. justice saurabh banerjeeorder% 04.05.20261. considering the chargesheet has been filed before the learned trial court, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition.2. as such, the present petition alongwith the pending application is dismissed as withdrawn. saurabh banerjee, j may 4, 2026/sothis is a digitally signed order. the authenticity of the order can be re-verified from delhi high court order portal by scanning the qr code shown above. the order is downloaded from the dhc server on 06/05/2026 at 12:13:04

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 2191/2022, CRL.M.A. 9272/2022 MISS A .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harshit Jain and Mr. Deepak Yadav, Advs.

versus

STATE AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar APP for State with Mr. Dinesh Kr., Ms. Upasna Bakshi and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advs with SI Priyanka, PS: North Rohini Ms. Sakshi Sachdeva, Adv. for respondent no.2 (through VC)

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

ORDER

% 04.05.2026

1. Considering the chargesheet has been filed before the learned Trial Court, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition.

2. As such, the present petition alongwith the pending application is dismissed as withdrawn. SAURABH BANERJEE, J MAY 4, 2026/So

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2026 at 12:13:04

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial