Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Siddharth Kapur & Ors. vs Land an Development Office

Siddharth Kapur & Ors. vs Land an Development Office

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided May 29, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1265988

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CONT.CAS(C)/1013/2026
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Siddharth Kapur & Ors.

Advocate Mr. Mayank Wadhwa, Ms. Supriya Sharma, Ms. Muskan Gupta, Ms. Eccha Shukla

Respondent

Land an Development Office

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ cont.cas(c) 1013/2026 siddharth kapur & ors. .....petitioners through: mr. mayank wadhwa, ms. supriya sharma, ms. muskan gupta and ms. eccha shukla, advs.versusland an development office .....respondent through: none.coram:hon’ble mr. justice purushaindra kumar kauravorder% 29.05.20261. the court does not find any reason to initiate the contempt proceedings, in absence of there being an explicit direction of the court to finalize sop. however, delay has been alleged by the petitioner.2. whether the delay is deliberate or bona fide shall be considered on the next date of hearing in the main writ petition.3. with this observation, petition stands disposed of. purushaindra kumar kaurav, j may 29, 2026/pthis is a digitally signed order. the authenticity of the order can be re-verified from delhi high court order portal by scanning the qr code shown above. the order is downloaded from the dhc server on 01/06/2026 at 11:11:23

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CONT.CAS(C) 1013/2026 SIDDHARTH KAPUR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mayank Wadhwa, Ms. Supriya Sharma, Ms. Muskan Gupta and Ms. Eccha Shukla, Advs.

versus

LAND AN DEVELOPMENT OFFICE .....Respondent Through: None.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

ORDER

% 29.05.2026

1. The Court does not find any reason to initiate the contempt proceedings, in absence of there being an explicit direction of the Court to finalize SOP. However, delay has been alleged by the petitioner.

2. Whether the delay is deliberate or bona fide shall be considered on the next date of hearing in the main writ petition.

3. With this observation, petition stands disposed of. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MAY 29, 2026/P

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/06/2026 at 11:11:23

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial