Sushil Kumar vs Union of India and Ors

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided May 29, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1265970

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1265970
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice C.Hari Shankar,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Om Prakash Shukla
Decided On: May 29, 2026
Case Number: W.P.(C)/7892/2026
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sushil Kumar

Advocate Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. A.S. Singh, Ms. Shriya Sharma

Respondent

Union of India and Ors

Advocate Mr. Anil Panwar, Mr. Amit Kumar Rana, Mr. Sahej Sawhney, Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Mr. Manish Kumar Singh, Mr. Vasu Agarwal

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ w.p.(c) 7892/2026, cm appl. 38100/2026, cm appl. sushil kumar .....petitioner through: mr. r.v. sinha, mr. a.s. singh and ms. shriya sharma, advs.versusunion of india and ors .....respondents through: mr. anil panwar, spc with mr. amit kumar rana, gp and mr. sahej sawhney, advs. for r-1 & 2 mr. ravinder agarwal, mr. manish kumar singh and mr. vasu agarwal, advs. for cvccoram:hon'ble mr. justice c. hari shankarhon'ble mr. justice om prakash shuklaorder (oral)% 29.05.2026c.hari shankar, j.1. mr. sinha, after some hearing, seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition. the leave is granted as aforesaid.2. however, we make it clear that the cvo in the office of controller general of patents, designs and trade marks should dispassionately and independently apply his mind to the material provided by the petitioner.3. we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the w.p.(c) 7892/2026 page 1 of 2 allegations. liberty shall stand reserved with the petitioner to avail legal remedies at the appropriate stage.4. the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.c. hari shankar, j.om prakash shukla, j.may 29, 2026/ar w.p.(c) 7892/2026 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 7892/2026, CM APPL. 38100/2026, CM APPL. SUSHIL KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R.V. Sinha, Mr. A.S. Singh and Ms. Shriya Sharma, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Panwar, SPC with Mr. Amit Kumar Rana, GP and Mr. Sahej Sawhney, Advs. for R-1 & 2 Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Mr. Manish Kumar Singh and Mr. Vasu Agarwal, Advs. for CVC
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

ORDER (ORAL)

% 29.05.2026

C.HARI SHANKAR, J.

1. Mr. Sinha, after some hearing, seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition. The leave is granted as aforesaid.

2. However, we make it clear that the CVO in the office of Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks should dispassionately and independently apply his mind to the material provided by the petitioner.

3. We have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the W.P.(C) 7892/2026 Page 1 of 2 allegations. Liberty shall stand reserved with the petitioner to avail legal remedies at the appropriate stage.

4. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.

MAY 29, 2026/AR W.P.(C) 7892/2026 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Sushil Kumar vs Union of India and Ors Same Subject MRTP Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice C.Hari Shankar,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Om Pra...