Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Union of India vs M/S Singh Constructions

Union of India vs M/S Singh Constructions

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided May 29, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1265901

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/431/2026
Subject
Arbitration

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Arbitration

Key legal issue
Arbitration

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Union of India

Advocate Mr. Om Prakash, Mr. Vikram Singh Arya, Mr. Chandresh Pratap, Ms. Swati Mishra, Mr. Prince Yadav, Ms. Ankita Yadav

Respondent

M/S Singh Constructions

Advocate Ms. Urzica Chauhan

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ o.m.p.(misc.)(comm.) 431/2026 union of india .....petitioner through: mr. om prakash, mr. vikram singh arya, mr. chandresh pratap, ms. swati mishra, mr. prince yadav, ms. ankita yadav, advocatesversusm/s singh constructions .....respondent through: ms. urzica chauhan, advocate.coram:hon'ble mr. justice subramonium prasadorder% 29.05.20261. the present petition under section 29a of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 has been filed by the petitioner for extending the mandate of the arbitral tribunal.2. material on record indicates that an arbitral tribunal was constitutedby this court vide order dated 04.02.2020 passed in an arbitration petition being arb.p. no. 609/2019. it is stated that pleadings were completed on 10.05.2021. it is stated that repeated extensions to the mandate have been granted by this court on various dates in petitions filed under section 29a of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996. the mandate of the arbitral tribunal is going to expire on 01.06.2026, and therefore, the present petition has been filed for extending the mandate of the arbitral tribunal.3. it is stated that final arguments are being advanced before the arbitral tribunal.4. learned counsel appearing for the respondent states that she has no objection if the mandate of the arbitral tribunal is extended.5. in view of the fact that substantial time and money has been spent inthe proceedings, and the arbitration proceedings is at the stage of final arguments, this court is inclined to extend the mandate of the arbitral tribunal till 31.12.2026, so that the award can also be pronounced on or before 31.12.2026.6. the petition is disposed of, along with the pending applications, if any. subramonium prasad, j may 29, 2026 s. zakir

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 431/2026 UNION OF INDIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Om Prakash, Mr. Vikram Singh Arya, Mr. Chandresh Pratap, Ms. Swati Mishra, Mr. Prince Yadav, Ms. Ankita Yadav, Advocates

versus

M/S SINGH CONSTRUCTIONS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Urzica Chauhan, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

ORDER

% 29.05.2026

1. The present petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the Petitioner for extending the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal.

2. Material on record indicates that an Arbitral Tribunal was constituted

by this Court vide Order dated 04.02.2020 passed in an arbitration petition being ARB.P. No. 609/2019. It is stated that pleadings were completed on 10.05.2021. It is stated that repeated extensions to the mandate have been granted by this Court on various dates in petitions filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is going to expire on 01.06.2026, and therefore, the present petition has been filed for extending the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal.

3. It is stated that final arguments are being advanced before the Arbitral Tribunal.

4. Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent states that she has no objection if the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal is extended.

5. In view of the fact that substantial time and money has been spent in

the proceedings, and the arbitration proceedings is at the stage of final arguments, this Court is inclined to extend the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal till 31.12.2026, so that the award can also be pronounced on or before 31.12.2026.

6. The petition is disposed of, along with the pending applications, if any. SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J MAY 29, 2026 S. Zakir

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial