Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs M/S Oyster Constro Care Pvt. Ltd.

Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs M/S Oyster Constro Care Pvt. Ltd.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided May 18, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1264984

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CM(M)/1159/2026
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajesh Kumar Gupta

Advocate Mr. Anshul Sharma, Mr. Vishesh Tomar

Respondent

M/S Oyster Constro Care Pvt. Ltd.

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ cm(m) 1159/2026 rajesh kumar gupta .....petitioner through: mr. anshul sharma and mr. vishesh tomar, advocates.versusm/s oyster constro care pvt. ltd. .....respondent through:coram:hon'ble mr. justice rajneesh kumar guptaorder% 18.05.20261. this hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. cm appl. 33600/2026 (for exemption)2. allowed, subject to all just exceptions.3. accordingly, the present application is disposed of. cm(m) 1159/20264. the present petition has been filed by the petitioner under article 227of the constitution of india seeking the following reliefs: “a) issue order(s) or direction(s) under article 227 by granting directions to the ld. trial court to expedite and conclude the trial in suit bearing no. cs dj 75/2019 & connected matter cs dj no. 10576/16 pending before the ld. district judge-02, south-east, saket court, new delhi, in a time bound manner, and/or b) pass appropriate directions that no unwarranted adjournments be granted to the respondents herein.”5. keeping in view the fact that the learned trial court is proceeding withthe matters in accordance with its own board, while taking into consideration the pendency and age of the cases before it, this court is of the opinion that in such circumstances, it would not be appropriate to issue any direction to the learned trial court for expeditious disposal or for concluding the trial within a time-bound manner.6. accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. rajneesh kumar gupta, j may 18, 2026/mr/ik

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CM(M) 1159/2026 RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anshul Sharma and Mr. Vishesh Tomar, Advocates.

versus

M/S OYSTER CONSTRO CARE PVT. LTD. .....Respondent Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

ORDER

% 18.05.2026

1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 33600/2026 (for exemption)

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

3. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of. CM(M) 1159/2026

4. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227

of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs: “a) Issue order(s) or direction(s) under Article 227 by granting directions to the Ld. Trial court to expedite and conclude the trial in suit bearing no. CS DJ 75/2019 & Connected matter CS DJ No. 10576/16 pending before the Ld. District Judge-02, South-East, Saket Court, New Delhi, in a time bound manner, and/or b) Pass appropriate directions that no unwarranted adjournments be granted to the Respondents herein.”

5. Keeping in view the fact that the learned Trial Court is proceeding with

the matters in accordance with its own board, while taking into consideration the pendency and age of the cases before it, this Court is of the opinion that in such circumstances, it would not be appropriate to issue any direction to the learned Trial Court for expeditious disposal or for concluding the trial within a time-bound manner.

6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MAY 18, 2026/MR/ik

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial