Sunil Sharma vs Indu Sharma

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided May 05, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1263871

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1263871
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Prateek Jalan
Decided On: May 05, 2026
Case Number: CRL.A./453/2026
Subject: Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sunil Sharma

Advocate Ms. Meenu Duggal

Respondent

Indu Sharma

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ crl.a. 453/2026 & crl.m.a. 13983/2026, crl.m.a. sunil sharma .....appellant through: ms. meenu duggal, advocate.versusindu sharma .....respondent through: none.coram:hon’ble mr. justice prateek jalanorder% 05.05.20261. by way of this appeal under section 380 of the bharatiya nagariksuraksha sanhita, 2023 [“bnss”], the appellant assails the order dated 11.12.2025 passed by the learned family court, north-east, karkardooma courts, delhi, and further seeks directions for initiation of proceedings under section 340 code of criminal procedure of india, 1973 [“cr pc”] (corresponding to section 379 bnss), as well as for registration of an fir against the respondent under sections sections 191/193/195/199 and 209 of the indian penal code, 1860).2. after some arguments, ms. meenu duggal, learned counsel for the appellant, seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal.3. the appeal, alongwith pending applications, is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.4. it is, however, clarified that this court has not expressed anyopinion on the merits of the case, and all rights and contentions of the parties in any future proceedings are left open to be adjudicated in accordance with law. prateek jalan, j may 5, 2026 ‘pv’/sd/

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.A. 453/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13983/2026, CRL.M.A. SUNIL SHARMA .....Appellant Through: Ms. Meenu Duggal, Advocate.
versus
INDU SHARMA .....Respondent Through: None.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

ORDER

% 05.05.2026

1. By way of this appeal under Section 380 of the Bharatiya Nagarik

Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [“BNSS”], the appellant assails the order dated 11.12.2025 passed by the learned Family Court, North-East, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, and further seeks directions for initiation of proceedings under Section 340 Code of Criminal Procedure of India, 1973 [“Cr PC”] (corresponding to Section 379 BNSS), as well as for registration of an FIR against the respondent under Sections Sections 191/193/195/199 and 209 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860).

2. After some arguments, Ms. Meenu Duggal, learned counsel for the appellant, seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal.

3. The appeal, alongwith pending applications, is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn.

4. It is, however, clarified that this Court has not expressed any

opinion on the merits of the case, and all rights and contentions of the parties in any future proceedings are left open to be adjudicated in accordance with law. PRATEEK JALAN, J MAY 5, 2026 ‘pv’/SD/

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Sunil Sharma vs Indu Sharma Same Subject Right to Information Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Prateek Jalan