Mana Devi vs Arjun Lal and Ors

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided May 04, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1263737

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1263737
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Decided On: May 04, 2026
Case Number: W.P.(C)/6020/2026
Subject: Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mana Devi

Respondent

Arjun Lal and Ors

Advocate Mr. Rajat Mohan Dwivedi, Ms. Anasuya Choudhury SPC

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ w.p.(c) 6020/2026 mana devi .....petitioner through: mr.akash singh, advocate.versusarjun lal and ors .....respondents through: mr. rajat mohan dwivedi, advocate for r-2. ms. anasuya choudhury spc and mr.rajat mohan dwivedi gp for r-3 and 4.coram:hon'ble mr. justice purushaindra kumar kauravorder% 04.05.2026 cm appl. 29684/2026 (for exemption)1. exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. the application stands disposed of. w.p.(c) 6020/20261. the nature of relief sought in the instant petition is not directlyamenable under writ jurisdiction. the petitioner has to take remedy under the provisions of the maintenance and welfare of parents and senior citizens act, 2007 (‘act of 2007’). there does not seem to be any proper application, as required, before the concerned authority.2. for the said reason, the instant petition stands dismissed.3. liberty is, however, granted to the petitioner to undertake the appropriate exercise in accordance with the mandate of the act of 2007. purushaindra kumar kaurav, j may 4, 2026/nc

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 6020/2026 MANA DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Akash Singh, Advocate.
Versus
ARJUN LAL AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajat Mohan Dwivedi, Advocate for R-2. Ms. Anasuya Choudhury SPC and Mr.Rajat Mohan Dwivedi GP for R-3 and 4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

ORDER

% 04.05.2026 CM APPL. 29684/2026 (for exemption)

1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6020/2026

1. The nature of relief sought in the instant petition is not directly

amenable under writ jurisdiction. The petitioner has to take remedy under the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (‘Act of 2007’). There does not seem to be any proper application, as required, before the concerned authority.

2. For the said reason, the instant petition stands dismissed.

3. Liberty is, however, granted to the petitioner to undertake the appropriate exercise in accordance with the mandate of the Act of 2007. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MAY 4, 2026/Nc

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Mana Devi vs Arjun Lal and Ors Same Subject Right to Information Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav