Surinder Kumar Jain vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided May 04, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1263687

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1263687
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula
Decided On: May 04, 2026
Case Number: W.P.(C)/6024/2026
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Surinder Kumar Jain

Advocate Mr. Sujeet Beniwal

Respondent

Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

Advocate Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Mr. Prateek Dhir, Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. M. S. Akhtar, Ms. Joohu Kumari, Mr. Kushagra Dixit

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ w.p.(c) 6024/2026 & cm appl. 29779/2026 surinder kumar jain .....petitioner through: mr. sujeet beniwal, advocate.versusdelhi development authority & ors. .....respondents through: ms. shobhana takiar, sc, dda with mr. prateek dhir and mr. kuljeet singh, advocates for dda. mr. sanjay kumar pathak, sc, l&b with mr. sunil kumar jha, mr. m. s. akhtar, ms. joohu kumari and mr. kushagra dixit, advocates.coram:hon'ble mr. justice sanjeev narulaorder% 04.05.20261. the petitioner claims to be the lawful owner of various parcels of landsituated in village kadipur, alipur, delhi, and alleges that the said properties are under encroachment and unauthorised construction; accordingly, the present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent authorities to carry out measurement and demarcation of the said land.2. after making some submissions, counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take recourse to appropriate legal remedies, in accordance with law.3. leave and liberty as prayer for, are granted.4. the petition is accordingly disposed of, along with all pending applications(s), if any. sanjeev narula, j may 4, 2026/hc

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 6024/2026 & CM APPL. 29779/2026 SURINDER KUMAR JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sujeet Beniwal, Advocate.
versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, SC, DDA with Mr. Prateek Dhir and Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Advocates for DDA. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, SC, L&B with Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. M. S. Akhtar, Ms. Joohu Kumari and Mr. Kushagra Dixit, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

ORDER

% 04.05.2026

1. The Petitioner claims to be the lawful owner of various parcels of land

situated in Village Kadipur, Alipur, Delhi, and alleges that the said properties are under encroachment and unauthorised construction; accordingly, the present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondent authorities to carry out measurement and demarcation of the said land.

2. After making some submissions, counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take recourse to appropriate legal remedies, in accordance with law.

3. Leave and liberty as prayer for, are granted.

4. The petition is accordingly disposed of, along with all pending applications(s), if any. SANJEEV NARULA, J MAY 4, 2026/hc

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2026 Same Parties Surinder Kumar Jain vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors. Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula