Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Avinash Kumar vs State & Anr.

Avinash Kumar vs State & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided May 05, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1263457

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.REV.P./471/2024
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Avinash Kumar

Advocate Mr. Rishabh Malhotra

Respondent

State & Anr.

Advocate Mr. Satish Kumar, Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Ms. Upasan Bakshi, Mr. Gourav Singh

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ crl.rev.p. 471/2024, crl.m.a. 14916/2024 avinash kumar .....petitioner through: mr. rishabh malhotra, adv. (through vc)versusstate & anr. .....respondents through: mr. satish kumar, app with mr. aditya vikram singh, ms. upasan bakshi and mr. gourav singh, advs.coram:hon'ble mr. justice saurabh banerjeeorder% 05.05.20261. at the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition in view of the judgement dated 03.01.2026 passed by the learned trial court whereby the petitioner has been acquitted.2. as such, the present petition, along with the pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn.saurabh banerjee, j.may 05, 2026/ab this is a digitally signed order. the authenticity of the order can be re-verified from delhi high court order portal by scanning the qr code shown above. the order is downloaded from the dhc server on 07/05/2026 at 12:19:12

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.REV.P. 471/2024, CRL.M.A. 14916/2024 AVINASH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rishabh Malhotra, Adv. (through VC)

versus

STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Ms. Upasan Bakshi and Mr. Gourav Singh, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

ORDER

% 05.05.2026

1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition in view of the judgement dated 03.01.2026 passed by the learned Trial Court whereby the petitioner has been acquitted.

2. As such, the present petition, along with the pending application, is dismissed as withdrawn.

SAURABH BANERJEE, J.

MAY 05, 2026/Ab This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 12:19:12

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2026 Same Parties Avinash Kumar vs State & Anr. Same Subject Right to Information Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee
Right to Information trial court high court Has been

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales