Rahul (Through Pairokaar) vs State Through Io & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Apr 10, 2026

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1261745

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1261745
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Girish Kathpalia
Decided On: Apr 10, 2026
Case Number: BAIL APPLN./1409/2026
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rahul (Through Pairokaar)

Advocate Mr. Madhav Khurana, Mr. Shashank Dewan, Mr. Amit Badesra, Ms. Nikita Dewan, Mr. Ayush Kumar, Ms. Kashvi Bansal, Ms. Ananya

Respondent

State Through Io & Anr.

Advocate Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal

Excerpt

.....si pinky.coram: justice girish kathpaliaj u d g m e n t (oral)1. the accused/applicant seeks interim bail for a period of 10 days incase fir no. 305/2025 of police station vasant kunj, north for offence under section 376/506/509 ipc read with section 6/12 of pocso act.2. broadly speaking, the interim bail for a period of 10 days is sought bythe accused/applicant in order to attend marriage of his brother. prosecution strongly objects to grant of interim bail in view of the seriousness of allegations and stage of trial.bail appln. 1409/2026 page 1 of 2 pagesgirish 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=high court of delhi,cid - 7047638,signature not verified serialnumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=girish kathpalia date: 2026.04.10 05:09:10 -07'00'3. in the previous call, it was proposed that the accused/applicant can besent in custody from morning till evening so that he may attend marriage of his brother. learned app was agreeable provided the accused/applicant bears the expenses for taking the jail van and guards. but learned senior counsel took passover to obtain instructions.4. in this second call, with consent of both sides, this application isdisposed of directing that on 25.04.2026 at about 08:00 am, the accused/applicant in custody of appropriate number of guards shall be taken from the jail to the place of marriage as reflected in the marriage invitation card annexure p-11 and from there, he shall be brought back to delhi by 08:00 pm and that the expenditure for the said visit shall be borne by the accused/applicant after he returns to the jail.5. copy of this order be sent to the concerned jail superintendent forcompliance.6. accompanying application also stands disposed of.girish 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca,ou=high court of delhi,cid - 7047638,serialnumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d.....

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Decision: 10.04.2026
+ BAIL APPLN. 1409/2026 & CRL.M.A. 11158/2026 RAHUL (THROUGH PAIROKAAR) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Madhav Khurana, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Shashank Dewan, Mr. Amit Badesra, Ms. Nikita Dewan, Mr. Ayush Kumar, Ms. Kashvi Bansal and Ms. Ananya, Advocates.
versus
STATE THROUGH IO & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, APP for State with SI Pinky.
CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

1. The accused/applicant seeks interim bail for a period of 10 days in

case FIR No. 305/2025 of Police Station Vasant Kunj, North for offence under Section 376/506/509 IPC read with Section 6/12 of POCSO Act.

2. Broadly speaking, the interim bail for a period of 10 days is sought by

the accused/applicant in order to attend marriage of his brother. Prosecution strongly objects to grant of interim bail in view of the seriousness of allegations and stage of trial.

BAIL APPLN. 1409/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages

GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638,

Signature Not Verified serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557

0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.04.10 05:09:10 -07'00'

3. In the previous call, it was proposed that the accused/applicant can be

sent in custody from morning till evening so that he may attend marriage of his brother. Learned APP was agreeable provided the accused/applicant bears the expenses for taking the jail van and guards. But learned senior counsel took passover to obtain instructions.

4. In this second call, with consent of both sides, this application is

disposed of directing that on 25.04.2026 at about 08:00 am, the accused/applicant in custody of appropriate number of guards shall be taken from the jail to the place of marriage as reflected in the marriage invitation card Annexure P-11 and from there, he shall be brought back to Delhi by 08:00 pm and that the expenditure for the said visit shall be borne by the accused/applicant after he returns to the jail.

5. Copy of this order be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent for

compliance.

6. Accompanying application also stands disposed of.

GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca,

ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638,

serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d 15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff 801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.04.10 05:08:54 -07'00'

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) APRIL 10, 2026/dr

BAIL APPLN. 1409/2026 Page 2 of 2 pages

Signature Not Verified

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2026 Same Parties Rahul (Through Pairokaar) vs State Through Io & Anr. Same Subject MRTP Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Girish Kathpalia