Advanced Search Results

Master 'X' vs. 'Y'

Court : Delhi

Appellant : Master 'X'

Respondent : 'Y'

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 - Sections 23; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 112

Reported in : AIR2003Delhi195; 2003(69)DRJ21

ORDERManmohan Sarin, J. 1. By this Judgment IAs 5018/2002 and 5019/2002 are being decided. Vide is 5018/2002 plaintiff seeks a direction to the defendant to undergo the DNA test along with plaintiffs mother, to establish the...

X Vs. Y

Court : Supreme Court of India

Appellant : X

Respondent : Y

Subject : Family

2024 INSC476Non­Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7210 OF2024X … Appellant versus Y … Respondent JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J.FACTUAL ASPECTS1 This is an unfortunate case in which the appellant­...

X Vs Y

Court : Delhi

Appellant : X

Respondent : Y

Subject : Intellectual Property

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 214/2025 and I.A. 6283/2025 HERO INVESTCORP PVT.LTD & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Kunal Khanna, Mr. Madhav Anand, Mr. Krtin Bhasin, Mr. Udit Sharma, Mr. Kaulik...

X Vs. Y and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Appellant : X

Respondent : Y and ors.

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 24

Reported in : AIR1979HP29

ORDERT.U. Mehta, C.J. 1. This is an application for transfer of Civil Suit No. 130/6/77 from the court of Solan to the Court at Simla principally on the ground that when the hearing of the case...

X Wife Vs. Y - Husband

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : X Wife

Respondent : Y - Husband

Subject : Family

A.S. Oka, J. 1. Considering the nature of the dispute, the names of the parties are not mentioned in the cause title. 2. By this appeal, the appellant-wife has taken an exception to the judgment and...

X Vs. Y

Court : Mumbai

Appellant : X

Respondent : Y

Subject : Land Acquisition

S.C. Gupte, J. 1. This appeal is filed by the Appellant husband, whose petition for divorce against the Respondent wife was dismissed by the Family Court. Considering the nature of dispute, we have blocked the names...