Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Gayatri Projects Limited vs National Highways Authority of India

Gayatri Projects Limited vs National Highways Authority of India

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Mar 27, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1259965

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/272/2026
Subject
Arbitration

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Arbitration

Key legal issue
Arbitration

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gayatri Projects Limited

Advocate Mr. Angad Mehta, Mr. Arsh, Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, Mr. Kuldeep Kasana, Mr. Lubna Naaz, Ms. Vanshika Sharma

Respondent

National Highways Authority of India

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ o.m.p.(misc.)(comm.) 272/2026 & i.a. 8221/2026 gayatri projects limited .....petitioner through: mr. angad mehta and mr. arsh, advs.versusnational highways authority of india .....respondent through: mr. amit singh chauhan, mr. kuldeep kasana, mr. lubna naaz and ms. vanshika sharma, advs.coram:hon'ble mr. justice avneesh jhinganorder% 27.03.20261. this petition is filed under section 29a of the arbitration &conciliation act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to theprayer made.3. in view of the above, the time period for conclusion of theproceedings is extended by one year.4. this petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.avneesh jhingan, jmarch 27, 2026/pathis is a digitally signed order. the authenticity of the order can be re-verified from delhi high court order portal by scanning the qr code shown above. the order is downloaded from the dhc server on 30/03/2026 at 17:32:13

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 272/2026 & I.A. 8221/2026 GAYATRI PROJECTS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Angad Mehta and Mr. Arsh, Advs.

versus

NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Singh Chauhan, Mr. Kuldeep Kasana, Mr. Lubna Naaz and Ms. Vanshika Sharma, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

ORDER

% 27.03.2026

1. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration &

Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to the

prayer made.

3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the

proceedings is extended by one year.

4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J

MARCH 27, 2026/Pa

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/03/2026 at 17:32:13

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial