Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Toshar Kumar vs the Town Vending Ccommiitee (Tvc) - Ndmc & Ors.

Toshar Kumar vs The Town Vending Ccommiitee (Tvc) - Ndmc & Ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Mar 23, 2026
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1259669

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P.(C)/3697/2026
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Toshar Kumar

Advocate Mr. Satish Kumar Tripathi, Ms. Shagun Shahi Chugh, Mr. Varun Chugh, Ms. Ayushi Agarwal, Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, Mr. Chetanya Singh, Mr. Soumit Ganguli Ms Ravicha, Ms. Shruti Agarwal Mr Akash Sharma

Respondent

The Town Vending Ccommiitee (Tvc) - Ndmc & Ors.

Excerpt

.....case of thepetitioner is that he has been carrying on vending activities at the said vending site along with his father, and upon the demise of his father, he has continued to operate the said vending site.13. under section 5(2) of the street vendors (protection of livelihood andregulation of street vending) act, 2014. the dependent child of the street vendor can be permitted to vend in place of his/her parents. it is on the strength of this provision that the petitioner prays for relief.14. in the facts of the present case, let the documents in this matter beverified by the director enforcement, ndmc. the director enforcement, ndmc shall decide, after verifying all the credentials, whether the petitioner would be entitled to substitution of his name in place of his father, in terms of section 5(2) of the street vendors (protection of livelihood and regulation of street vending) act, 2014. thereafter, the representation of the petitioner for substitution of his name in the cov shall be proceeded with in accordance with law.15. accordingly, the petitioner shall appear before the directorenforcement, ndmc on 16th april, 2026 at 11:30 am. the director enforcement, ndmc shall after hearing the petitioner, decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of four months. all rights and remedies are left open.16. if any coercive measures are taken against the petitioner by thesigned by:renuka w.p.(c) 3697/2026 page 3 of 4respondents, the petitioner is at liberty to approach the court.17. the present petition is disposed of in above terms. pendingapplications, if any, are also disposed of.prathiba m. singhmadhu jainmarch 23, 2026/prg/smsigned by:renuka w.p.(c) 3697/2026 page 4 of 4

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of decision: 23rd March, 2026 Uploaded on: 25th March, 2026 + W.P.(C) 3697/2026 & CM APPL. 17979/2026

TOSHAR KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Satish Kumar Tripathi, Adv.

versus

THE TOWN VENDING CCOMMIITEE (TVC) - NDMC & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shagun Shahi Chugh, Mr. Varun Chugh and Ms. Ayushi Agarwal, Advs. Mr. Sriharsha Peechara Standing Counsel for NDMC Mr. Chetanya Singh, Addl. Standing Counsel Mr Soumit Ganguli Ms Ravicha sharma Ms Shruti Agarwal Mr Akash Sharma Advocates

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner- Mr. Toshar Kumar

under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking directions to the Respondents to decide the representation dated 27th February, 2026 regarding the substitution of the name of the Petitioner in place of his deceased father in the Certificate of Vending (hereinafter, ‘CoV’).

Signed By:RENUKA W.P.(C) 3697/2026 Page 1 of 4

3. The brief background of the present case is that the Petitioner is stated

to be the son of Late Mr. Narender Kumar, who was surveyed by the Town Vending Committee sometime in 2025. Petitioner’s father was found to be an eligible vendor at the site i.e., near Shop No. 137 (Silver Corner) Sarojini Nagar Market, New Delhi - ll0023 (hereinafter, ‘vending site’).

4. Thereafter, the father of the Petitioner was issued a CoV bearing No.

V2025702229.

5. The case of the Petitioner is that his father was vending at the vending

site for several years and is stated to have been previously found eligible for a vending certificate in the ‘General list’ bearing Serial No. 2594 of 3792 as well as in ‘SC/ST List’ bearing Serial No. 308 of 396, by the New Delhi Municipal Council (hereinafter, ‘NDMC’), sometime in 2011-2012.

6. The further case of the Petitioner is that Petitioner’s mother passed

away on 24th February, 2019 and that his father passed away on 26th January, 2026.

7. Petitioner’s father left behind three daughters and two sons. The

Petitioner is one of the sons. He has obtained a No-Objection Certificate from the remaining legal heirs of Late Mr. Narender Kumar.

8. Pursuant thereto, the Petitioner made a representation dated 27th

February, 2026 to the Town Vending Committee, NDMC to substitute the name of the Petitioner in place of his deceased father in the CoV.

9. Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the grievance of the

Petitioner in the present petition is that the TVC, NDMC has not considered the representation of the Petitioner.

10. Further, Ld. Counsel for the Petitioner also submits that in the

meantime the Petitioner may not be harassed from carrying out his vending

Signed By:RENUKA W.P.(C) 3697/2026 Page 2 of 4

activities from the vending site.

11. Mr. Soumit Ganguli ld. Counsel appearing for Mr. Sriharsha Peechara,

ld. Counsel for the NDMC submits that the Petitioner has to establish that he is a dependent child.

12. The Court has heard the ld. Counsel for the parties. The case of the

Petitioner is that he has been carrying on vending activities at the said vending site along with his father, and upon the demise of his father, he has continued to operate the said vending site.

13. Under Section 5(2) of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and

Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014. The dependent child of the street vendor can be permitted to vend in place of his/her parents. It is on the strength of this provision that the Petitioner prays for relief.

14. In the facts of the present case, let the documents in this matter be

verified by the Director Enforcement, NDMC. The Director Enforcement, NDMC shall decide, after verifying all the credentials, whether the Petitioner would be entitled to substitution of his name in place of his father, in terms of Section 5(2) of the Street Vendors (Protection of Livelihood and Regulation of Street Vending) Act, 2014. Thereafter, the representation of the Petitioner for substitution of his name in the CoV shall be proceeded with in accordance with law.

15. Accordingly, the Petitioner shall appear before the Director

Enforcement, NDMC on 16th April, 2026 at 11:30 AM. The Director Enforcement, NDMC shall after hearing the Petitioner, decide the representation of the Petitioner within a period of four months. All rights and remedies are left open.

16. If any coercive measures are taken against the Petitioner by the

Signed By:RENUKA W.P.(C) 3697/2026 Page 3 of 4

Respondents, the Petitioner is at liberty to approach the Court.

17. The present petition is disposed of in above terms. Pending

applications, if any, are also disposed of.

PRATHIBA M. SINGH

MADHU JAIN

MARCH 23, 2026/prg/sm

Signed By:RENUKA W.P.(C) 3697/2026 Page 4 of 4

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial