Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Deepak vs the Office of District and Sessions Judge (Headquarters)

Deepak vs The Office of District and Sessions Judge (Headquarters)

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Mar 27, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1258939

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P.(C)/2193/2021
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deepak

Advocate Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam, Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat

Respondent

The Office of District and Sessions Judge (Headquarters)

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ w.p.(c) 2193/2021 deepak .....petitioner through: ms. chandrika gupta, advocate.versusthe office of district and sessions judge(headquarters) .....respondent through: ms. avnish ahlawat, standing counsel with mr. nitesh kumar singh, ms. aliza alam and mr. mohnish sehrawat, advocates.coram:hon'ble mr. justice sanjeev narulaorder% 27.03.20261. counsel for the petitioner submits that she has received instructionsfrom the petitioner that he does not wish to pursue the present petition and, accordingly, seeks leave to withdraw the same.2. the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.sanjeev narula, jmarch 27, 2026asthis is a digitally signed order. the authenticity of the order can be re-verified from delhi high court order portal by scanning the qr code shown above. the order is downloaded from the dhc server on 30/03/2026 at 16:17:45

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 2193/2021 DEEPAK .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Advocate.

versus

THE OFFICE OF DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE

(HEADQUARTERS) .....Respondent Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

ORDER

% 27.03.2026

1. Counsel for the Petitioner submits that she has received instructions

from the Petitioner that he does not wish to pursue the present petition and, accordingly, seeks leave to withdraw the same.

2. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

SANJEEV NARULA, J

MARCH 27, 2026

as

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/03/2026 at 16:17:45

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Deepak vs The Office of District and Sessions Judge (Headquar... Same Subject Right to Information Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjeev Narula
Right to Information

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales