Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Rajesh & Ors. vs State

Rajesh & Ors. vs STATE

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Feb 16, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1258810

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.A./355/2004
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajesh & Ors.

Advocate Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan

Respondent

STATE

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ crl.a. 355/2004 & crl. m.a.4205/2004 rajesh & ors. .....appellants through: none.versusstate .....respondent through: mr. yudhvir singh chauhan, app for the state with si ramphool ps ambedkar nagar.coram:hon'ble mr. justice vimal kumar yadavorder% 16.02.20261. hybrid mode.2. this is a common appeal filed on behalf of three appellants namelyrajesh, ram narain and smt.prem wati.3. appellant(s) are reported to have expired and so are their sureties,which fact has been endorsed by ld.app for the state on the basis of the reports already on record.4. in view of these facts and circumstances and considering the fact thatnone has appeared on behalf of the legal heirs of the appellants to contest the instant appeal, therefore the appeal stands “abated”.vimal kumar yadav, jfebruary 16, 2026/bjthis is a digitally signed order. the authenticity of the order can be re-verified from delhi high court order portal by scanning the qr code shown above. the order is downloaded from the dhc server on 19/02/2026 at 12:22:39

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.A. 355/2004 & CRL. M.A.4205/2004 RAJESH & ORS. .....Appellants Through: None.

versus

STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP for the State with SI Ramphool PS Ambedkar Nagar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV

ORDER

% 16.02.2026

1. Hybrid Mode.

2. This is a common appeal filed on behalf of three appellants namely

Rajesh, Ram Narain and Smt.Prem Wati.

3. Appellant(s) are reported to have expired and so are their sureties,

which fact has been endorsed by Ld.APP for the State on the basis of the reports already on record.

4. In view of these facts and circumstances and considering the fact that

none has appeared on behalf of the legal heirs of the Appellants to contest the instant appeal, therefore the appeal stands “abated”.

VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J

FEBRUARY 16, 2026/bj

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/02/2026 at 12:22:39

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial