Seema Fatima vs Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Apr 29, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1258094

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1258094
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
Decided On: Apr 29, 2026
Case Number: W.P.(C)/3294/2022
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Seema Fatima

Advocate Mr. Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Mr. Neelakash Sharma, Mr. Vikalp Chandela, Mr. Siddhant Nath, Mr. Amaan Khan, Mr. Bhavishya Makhija

Respondent

Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development Corporation

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ w.p.(c) 3294/2022, cm appl. 9565/2022seema fatima.....petitioner through: mr rajiv kumar ghawana, mr. neelakash sharma and mr. vikalp chandela, advocates.versusdelhi tourism and transportation developmentcorporation.....respondent through: mr. siddhant nath, mr. amaan khan and mr. bhavishya makhija, advocates.coram:hon'ble mr. justice purushaindra kumar kauravorder% 29.04.20261. in deference to the observations made by the court, mr. rajivkumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he may be granted liberty to approach the jurisdictional magistrate under section 152 of bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023.2. he, however, submits that in case the grievance is not fully mitigatedhe may further granted liberty to take appropriate recourse.3. the submissions made by mr. rajiv kumar, learned counselappearing on behalf of the petitioner seems to be reasonable, accordingly,the petition stands disposed of with liberty to approach concerned district magistrate. if the petitioner does so, let his grievance be dealt with in accordance with law. if the grievance is not fully mitigated, the petitioner thereafter shall be at liberty to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law.4. with the aforesaid observations, the petition stands disposed of alongwith pending application.purushaindra kumar kaurav, japril 29, 2026ar

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 3294/2022, CM APPL. 9565/2022

SEEMA FATIMA

.....Petitioner Through: Mr Rajiv Kumar Ghawana, Mr. Neelakash Sharma and Mr. Vikalp Chandela, Advocates.

versus

DELHI TOURISM AND TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT

CORPORATION

.....Respondent Through: Mr. Siddhant Nath, Mr. Amaan Khan and Mr. Bhavishya Makhija, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

ORDER

% 29.04.2026

1. In deference to the observations made by the Court, Mr. Rajiv

Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that he may be granted liberty to approach the Jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 152 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

2. He, however, submits that in case the grievance is not fully mitigated

he may further granted liberty to take appropriate recourse.

3. The submissions made by Mr. Rajiv Kumar, learned counsel

appearing on behalf of the petitioner seems to be reasonable, accordingly,

the petition stands disposed of with liberty to approach concerned District Magistrate. If the petitioner does so, let his grievance be dealt with in accordance with law. If the grievance is not fully mitigated, the petitioner thereafter shall be at liberty to take appropriate recourse in accordance with law.

4. With the aforesaid observations, the petition stands disposed of along

with pending application.

PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J

APRIL 29, 2026

AR

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Seema Fatima vs Delhi Tourism and Transportation Development ... Same Subject MRTP Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav