Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ajit Kumar vs State Nct of Delhi Through Sho Bawana

Ajit Kumar vs State Nct of Delhi Through Sho Bawana

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Mar 09, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1258046

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
BAIL APPLN./888/2026
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ajit Kumar

Advocate Mr. Rajneesh Solanki, Mr. Kartik Gupta, Ms. Manisha Singh, Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, Ms. Vanshika Singh, Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh

Respondent

State Nct of Delhi Through Sho Bawana

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ bail appln. 888/2026, crl.m.a. 6803/2026 ajit kumar .....applicant through: mr rajneesh solanki, mr. kartik gupta and ms. manisha singh, advs.versusstate nct of delhi through sho bawana.....respondent through: ms. meenakshi dahiya, app for the state with ms. vanshika singh and mr. bhanu pratap singh, advs. si- naveen sharma, ps: bawanacoram:hon'ble mr. justice saurabh banerjeeorder% 09.03.20261. by virtue of the present bail application under section 483 of thebharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023 (bnss), the applicant seeks grant of regular bail/ interim bail in fir no.36/2026 registered under section 20 of the narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances act, 1985 (ndps act) at ps: bawana, delhi.2. after some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant seeks towithdraw the present bail application.3. the present bail application, alongwith the pending applications, isdismissed as withdrawn.saurabh banerjee, jmarch 9, 2026/abthis is a digitally signed order. the authenticity of the order can be re-verified from delhi high court order portal by scanning the qr code shown above. the order is downloaded from the dhc server on 11/03/2026 at 10:05:37

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 888/2026, CRL.M.A. 6803/2026 AJIT KUMAR .....Applicant Through: Mr Rajneesh Solanki, Mr. Kartik Gupta and Ms. Manisha Singh, Advs.

versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO BAWANA

.....Respondent Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with Ms. Vanshika Singh and Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh, Advs. SI- Naveen Sharma, PS: Bawana

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

ORDER

% 09.03.2026

1. By virtue of the present bail application under Section 483 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant seeks grant of regular bail/ interim bail in FIR No.36/2026 registered under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) at PS: Bawana, Delhi.

2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant seeks to

withdraw the present bail application.

3. The present bail application, alongwith the pending applications, is

dismissed as withdrawn.

SAURABH BANERJEE, J

MARCH 9, 2026/Ab

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2026 at 10:05:37

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial