Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Deepak Kumar@Kallu vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Deepak Kumar@Kallu vs State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Mar 09, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1257892

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
BAIL APPLN./874/2026
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deepak Kumar@Kallu

Advocate Mr. Vaibhav Saini, Mr. Satish Kumar

Respondent

State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ bail appln. 874/2026, crl.m.a. 6743/2026, crl.m.a. 6744/2026deepak kumar@kallu .....applicant through: mohd. atif and mr. vaibhav saini, advs.versusstate of nct of delhi & anr. .....respondents through: mr. satish kumar, app for the state insp. satbir singh, ps: hauz qazicoram:hon'ble mr. justice saurabh banerjeeorder% 09.03.20261. by virtue of the present bail application under sections 483 and 528of the bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023 (bnss), the applicant seeks grant of interim bail in fir no.142/2022 registered under sections 308/341/34 of the indian penal code, 1860 (ipc) at ps: hauz khas.2. after some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant seeks towithdraw the present bail application.3. the present bail application, alongwith the pending applications, isdismissed as withdrawn.saurabh banerjee, jmarch 9, 2026/abthis is a digitally signed order. the authenticity of the order can be re-verified from delhi high court order portal by scanning the qr code shown above. the order is downloaded from the dhc server on 11/03/2026 at 10:05:41

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 874/2026, CRL.M.A. 6743/2026, CRL.M.A. 6744/2026

DEEPAK KUMAR@KALLU .....Applicant Through: Mohd. Atif and Mr. Vaibhav Saini, Advs.

versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State Insp. Satbir Singh, PS: Hauz Qazi

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

ORDER

% 09.03.2026

1. By virtue of the present bail application under Sections 483 and 528

of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the applicant seeks grant of interim bail in FIR No.142/2022 registered under Sections 308/341/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at PS: Hauz Khas.

2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant seeks to

withdraw the present bail application.

3. The present bail application, alongwith the pending applications, is

dismissed as withdrawn.

SAURABH BANERJEE, J

MARCH 9, 2026/Ab

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/03/2026 at 10:05:41

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial