Manoj Kumar vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Feb 27, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1257823

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1257823
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee
Decided On: Feb 27, 2026
Case Number: W.P.(CRL)/695/2026
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manoj Kumar

Advocate Mr. Rahul Malik, Ms. Poonam Kalkal, Ms. Anju Kataria, Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya

Respondent

State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr.

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ w.p.(crl) 695/2026, crl.m.a. 6534/2026 manoj kumar .....petitioner through: mr. rahul malik, ms. poonam kalkal and ms. anju kataria, advs.versusstate govt. of nct of delhi and anr......respondents through: ms. rupali bandhopadhya, asc for the state (through vc)\ si- lokesh kumar, ps: govind puricoram:hon'ble mr. justice saurabh banerjeeorder% 27.02.20261. by virtue of the present petition under article 226 of theconstitution of india read with section 528 of the of bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks issuance of a writ of mandamus transferring the investigation in fir no.39/2026 dated 15.01.2026 from ps: govind puri to the cbi.2. without adverting to the merits of the matter, learned asc for thestate, at the outset, submits that the police is actively involved in the proceedings as evident from the fir, which was registered on the very next day of the incident. be that as it may, she undertakes that a proper response to both the complaints dated 21.01.2026 and 29.01.2026 shall be communicated to the petitioner within a period of two weeks.3. in view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does notwish to press the present petition and seeks to withdraw the same.4. accordingly, the present petition, along with the pendingapplication, is dismissed as withdrawn in the aforesaid terms.saurabh banerjee, jfebruary 27, 2026/ab

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 695/2026, CRL.M.A. 6534/2026 MANOJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Malik, Ms. Poonam Kalkal and Ms. Anju Kataria, Advs.

versus

STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

.....Respondents Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for the State (Through VC)\ SI- Lokesh Kumar, PS: Govind Puri

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

ORDER

% 27.02.2026

1. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks issuance of a writ of mandamus transferring the investigation in FIR No.39/2026 dated 15.01.2026 from PS: Govind Puri to the CBI.

2. Without adverting to the merits of the matter, learned ASC for the

State, at the outset, submits that the police is actively involved in the proceedings as evident from the FIR, which was registered on the very next day of the incident. Be that as it may, she undertakes that a proper response to both the complaints dated 21.01.2026 and 29.01.2026 shall be communicated to the petitioner within a period of two weeks.

3. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the petitioner does not

wish to press the present petition and seeks to withdraw the same.

4. Accordingly, the present petition, along with the pending

application, is dismissed as withdrawn in the aforesaid terms.

SAURABH BANERJEE, J

FEBRUARY 27, 2026/Ab

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Manoj Kumar vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr. Same Subject MRTP Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee