Munni vs Lt. Governor and Ors

MUNNI vs Lt. Governor and Ors

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Feb 25, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1257543

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1257543
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee
Decided On: Feb 25, 2026
Case Number: W.P.(CRL)/667/2026
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

MUNNI

Advocate Mr. Prakash Khandelwal, Mr. Shiven Verma, Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Ms. Amisha Gupta

Respondent

Lt. Governor and Ors

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ w.p.(crl) 667/2026 munni .....petitioner through: mr. prakash khandelwal, advocate.versuslt. governor and ors .....respondent through: mr. shiven verma, advocate for r- 1 and r-2 (through vc) ms. rupali bandhopadhya, asc with mr. abhijeet kumar and ms. amisha gupta, advocates and si gunjan singh, ps-seelampurcoram:hon'ble mr. justice saurabh banerjeeorder% 25.02.20261. by virtue of the present petition under article 226 of theconstitution of india read with section 528 of the bharatiya nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023 (bnss), the petitioner seeks issuance of writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction the respondent no.1 to consider the request of the petitioner and issue sanction for prosecution of respondent no.32. learned asc, at the outset, submits that proceedings based on thecomplaint made by the petitioner are still pending and the delhi police officials are taking appropriate action (s) in accordance with law.3. at this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdrawthe present petition with liberty to initiate appropriate action(s), if any, asand when required, in accordance with law.4. the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.saurabh banerjee, jfebruary 25, 2026na

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 667/2026 MUNNI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prakash Khandelwal, Advocate.

versus

LT. GOVERNOR AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shiven Verma, Advocate for R- 1 and R-2 (Through VC) Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar and Ms. Amisha Gupta, Advocates and SI Gunjan Singh, PS-Seelampur

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

ORDER

% 25.02.2026

1. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioner seeks issuance of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction the respondent no.1 to consider the request of the petitioner and issue sanction for prosecution of respondent no.3

2. Learned ASC, at the outset, submits that proceedings based on the

complaint made by the petitioner are still pending and the Delhi Police officials are taking appropriate action (s) in accordance with law.

3. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw

the present petition with liberty to initiate appropriate action(s), if any, as

and when required, in accordance with law.

4. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

SAURABH BANERJEE, J

FEBRUARY 25, 2026

NA

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties MUNNI vs Lt. Governor and Ors Same Subject MRTP Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee