Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ravinder Kumar vs Prem Sharma & Ors.

Ravinder Kumar vs Prem Sharma & Ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Jan 29, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1255136

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RFA/98/2026
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ravinder Kumar

Respondent

Prem Sharma & Ors.

Excerpt

$~93 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi + rfa 98/2026, cm appl. 6109/2026 cm appl. 6110/2026, cm appl. 6111/2026 cm appl. 6112/2026 ravinder kumar .....appellant through: appearance not given. versus prem sharma & ors. .....respondent through: coram: hon'ble ms. justice neena bansal krishna order % 29.01.2026 1. regular first appeal under order xli read with section 96 cpc has been filed on behalf of the appellant for setting aside ex-parte judgment dated 27.07.2023 passed by learned adj-01, karkardooma courts, delhi. 2. learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to file a separate appeal against the judgment dated 03.01.2026, whereby his application under order 9 rule 13 has been dismissed and against the judgment dated 27.07.2023, whereby the suit against the appellant has been decreed ex-parte. 3. in view of the submissions made, the present appeal is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. the appeal stands disposed of along with the pending application(s).neena bansal krishna, j january 29, 2026/vathis is a digitally signed order. the authenticity of the order can be re-verified from delhi high court order portal by scanning the qr code shown above. the order is downloaded from the dhc server on 31/01/2026 at 14:36:05

Full Judgment

$~93 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 98/2026, CM APPL. 6109/2026 CM APPL. 6110/2026, CM APPL. 6111/2026 CM APPL. 6112/2026 RAVINDER KUMAR .....Appellant Through: Appearance not given. versus PREM SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA ORDER % 29.01.2026 1. Regular First Appeal under Order XLI read with Section 96 CPC has been filed on behalf of the Appellant for Setting aside Ex-parte Judgment dated 27.07.2023 passed by learned ADJ-01, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. 2. Learned counsel for the Appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present Appeal with liberty to file a separate Appeal against the Judgment dated 03.01.2026, whereby his Application under Order 9 Rule 13 has been dismissed and against the Judgment dated 27.07.2023, whereby the Suit against the Appellant has been Decreed Ex-parte. 3. In view of the submissions made, the present Appeal is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 4. The Appeal stands disposed of along with the pending Application(s).

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J JANUARY 29, 2026/va

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 31/01/2026 at 14:36:05

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial