Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Punit Mukhiya Vs. the State of Bihar and ors.

Punit Mukhiya vs The State of Bihar and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided Jul 04, 2003
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/123743

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
C.W.J.C. No. 6936 of 2001
Subject
;Election

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Bihar Panchayat Raj Rules, 1995 - Rule 79--Provisions of--Whether ultra vires--Merely because Returning Officer not recorded his reasons for recounting--Held, no here is no good ground that Rule 79 be declared as ultra vires. - - 3. In the circumstances, there is no good ground that Rule 79 aforesaid be declared a...

Key legal issue
;Election
Acts & sections
Bihar Panchayat Raj Rules, 1995 - Rule 79

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Punit Mukhiya

Advocate Raghu Nath Singh, Adv.

Respondent

The State of Bihar and ors.

Legal References

Acts
Bihar Panchayat Raj Rules, 1995 - Rule 79

Court's Analysis

Prior History

Ravi S. Dhawan, C.J. and R.N. Prasad, J.
1. There are two aspects of the matter. The first issue is as to whether there should have been recounting or not. This aspect is not before this Court.
2. The second issue is as to whether Rule 79 of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Rules, 1995 be declared as ultra vires. Merely because the Returning Officer may not have recorded his reasons is no ground to declare the rule ultra vires. The petitioner may have a case provided he makes It out one that a certio

Excerpt

bihar panchayat raj rules, 1995 - rule 79--provisions of--whether ultra vires--merely because returning officer not recorded his reasons for recounting--held, no here is no good ground that rule 79 be declared as ultra vires. - - 3. in the circumstances, there is no good ground that rule 79 aforesaid be declared as ultra vires.ravi s. dhawan, c.j. and r.n. prasad, j. 1. there are two aspects of the matter. the first issue is as to whether there should have been recounting or not. this aspect is not before this court. 2. the second issue is as to whether rule 79 of the bihar panchayat raj rules, 1995 be declared as ultra vires. merely because the returning officer may not have recorded his reasons is no ground to declare the rule ultra vires. the petitioner may have a case provided he makes it out one that a certiorari be issued for examining whether in terms of rule 79 the returning officer has recorded his reasons or not. depending on the record whether reasons are recorded or not, the court will examine the order of the returning officer. the fact that reasons may not be recorded is no ground to declare the rule ultra vires. 3. in the circumstances, there is no good ground that rule 79 aforesaid be declared as ultra vires. the matter which survives in the petition is whether the order of the returning officer under the rule is good, or bad. this matter in the normal course will be before the learned single judge.

Full Judgment

Ravi S. Dhawan, C.J. and R.N. Prasad, J.

1. There are two aspects of the matter. The first issue is as to whether there should have been recounting or not. This aspect is not before this Court.

2. The second issue is as to whether Rule 79 of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Rules, 1995 be declared as ultra vires. Merely because the Returning Officer may not have recorded his reasons is no ground to declare the rule ultra vires. The petitioner may have a case provided he makes It out one that a certiorari be issued for examining whether in terms of Rule 79 the Returning Officer has recorded his reasons or not. Depending on the record whether reasons are recorded or not, the Court will examine the order of the Returning Officer. The fact that reasons may not be recorded is no ground to declare the rule ultra vires.

3. In the circumstances, there is no good ground that Rule 79 aforesaid be declared as ultra vires.

The matter which survives in the petition is whether the order of the Returning Officer under the rule is good, or bad. This matter in the normal course will be before the learned Single Judge.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial