Sushil Kumar Singh Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Sushil Kumar Singh vs State of Bihar and ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided Jan 18, 2005

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/123376

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/123376
Court: Patna High Court
Judge: Narayan Roy, J.
Decided On: Jan 18, 2005
Case Number: C.W.J.C. No. 14770 of 2001
Subject: ;Service

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Law - Selection list--Second list of selection candidates on the post of police constable--Direction issued by the Deputy Inspector General of Police to publish second list--In pursuant to advertisement--Considering the facts and circumstances of the case direction issued to reconstitute the committee for th...

Key legal issue: ;Service
Acts & sections: Service Law

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sushil Kumar Singh

Respondent

State of Bihar and ors.

Legal References

Acts: Service Law

Court's Analysis

Prior History: Narayan Roy, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and JC to SC 6.
2. This writ application has been filed for issuance of a direction upon the respondents to publish the second list of selected candidates for appointment oh the post of police constable pursuant to advertisement No. 1 of 1998.
3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that second list of selected candidates has not been published even despite directions, issued by the Deputy Inspector General of Police,

Excerpt

service law - selection list--second list of selection candidates on the post of police constable--direction issued by the deputy inspector general of police to publish second list--in pursuant to advertisement--considering the facts and circumstances of the case direction issued to reconstitute the committee for the purpose of publication of second list of successful candidates. - .....vide order dated 12.11.2001 while granting four weeks time to the state counsel to take instruction observed :--'pendency of this case will not prevent the concerned authority from publishing the second list of the successful candidates for appointment to the post of police constable.'6. it appears that even after four years, second list of successful candidates has not been published. non-publication of the second list of successful candidates may be for the reason of transfer of some of the superintendents of police of gaya division, but, in any view of the matter, the director general of police, government of bihar, could have constituted a committee in accordance with law for this purpose.7. considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the director general of police, government of bihar, is directed to reconstitute the committee for the purpose of publication of the second list of successful candidates for the posts of police constable pursuant to advertisement no. 1 of 1998. this exercise, however, must be completed by the director general of police, government of bihar, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.8. in case, the committee is reconstituted within the aforesaid period, second list of successful candidates shall be published by the committee in accordance with law within a further period of four weeks from the date of constitution of the committee.9. with the direction/observation aforesaid, this application is disposed of.

Full Judgment

Narayan Roy, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and JC to SC 6.

2. This writ application has been filed for issuance of a direction upon the respondents to publish the second list of selected candidates for appointment oh the post of police constable pursuant to advertisement No. 1 of 1998.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that second list of selected candidates has not been published even despite directions, issued by the Deputy Inspector General of Police, Magadh Range, Gaya, dated 11th October, 2000.

4. JC to SC 6, however, submits that the committee is required to be reconstituted and some of the Superintendents of Police have been transferred.

5. It appears that this Court vide order dated 12.11.2001 while granting four weeks time to the State counsel to take instruction observed :--

'Pendency of this case will not prevent the concerned authority from publishing the second list of the successful candidates for appointment to the post of police constable.'

6. It appears that even after four years, second list of successful candidates has not been published. Non-publication of the second list of successful candidates may be for the reason of transfer of some of the Superintendents of Police of Gaya Division, but, in any view of the matter, the Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, could have constituted a committee in accordance with law for this purpose.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, is directed to reconstitute the committee for the purpose of publication of the second list of successful candidates for the posts of police constable pursuant to advertisement No. 1 of 1998. This exercise, however, must be completed by the Director General of Police, Government of Bihar, within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

8. In case, the committee is reconstituted within the aforesaid period, second list of successful candidates shall be published by the committee in accordance with law within a further period of four weeks from the date of constitution of the committee.

9. With the direction/observation aforesaid, this application is disposed of.

Same Court & Year Patna · 2005 Same Parties Sushil Kumar Singh vs State of Bihar and ors. Same Subject ;Service Same Judge Narayan Roy, J. Acts & Sections Service Law

;Service