Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mr Imran Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Mr Imran vs The State Of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Decided Aug 26, 2021
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1233631

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.P 2564/2021
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mr Imran

Respondent

The State Of Karnataka

Excerpt

1 in the high court of karnataka at bengaluru dated this the6h day of december, 2021 before the hon' ble mr. justice s.g. pandit review petition no.288/2021 between:1. ramamurthy r s/o rangappa c aged about52years r/at no.543, sy no.17 2nd cross, maruthi nagar1t stage, ullal upa nagar bangalore - 110.2. k raghavendra s/o krishnappa aged about42years r/at no.214, 8th main, 18th cross, malleshwaram bbmp quarters bangalore - 53. ...petitioners (by sri srinivas v, advocate) and:1. the commissioner bruhath bangalore mahanagara palike n r square bangalore - 560 001.2. the deputy commissioner(admin) bruhath bangalore mahanagara palike, n.r.square bangalore - 560 001. …respondents (by sri b s gowtham, advocate for r1 & r2) 2 this review petition is filed under order47rule1of cpc praying to review the order dated1008.2021 passed in w.p no.12058/2021 (s-res) and consequently to allow the writ petition filed by the petitioners, in the interest of justice and equity. this petition coming on for admission this day, the court made the following:- order the petitioners are before this court in this review petition seeking to review the order dated 10.08.2021 passed in w.p.no.12058/2021 (s-res).2. learned counsel for the respondents files a memo dated 06.12.2021 enclosing the order dated 03.12.2021 whereby the order of suspension is reviewed and extended. in view of extension of the order of suspension by order dated 03.12.2021, it is open for the petitioners to challenge the said order. with the above observation, review petition stands disposed of. sd/- judge ng* ct:bms

Full Judgment

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE6H DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G. PANDIT REVIEW PETITION No.288/2021 BETWEEN:

1. RAMAMURTHY R S/O RANGAPPA C AGED ABOUT52YEARS R/AT No.543, SY No.17 2ND CROSS, MARUTHI NAGAR1T STAGE, ULLAL UPA NAGAR BANGALORE - 110.

2. K RAGHAVENDRA S/O KRISHNAPPA AGED ABOUT42YEARS R/AT No.214, 8TH MAIN, 18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM BBMP QUARTERS BANGALORE - 53. ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI SRINIVAS V, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE N R SQUARE BANGALORE - 560 001.

2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER(ADMIN) BRUHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R.SQUARE BANGALORE - 560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B S GOWTHAM, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) 2 THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER

47RULE1OF CPC PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER

DATED1008.2021 PASSED IN W.P No.12058/2021 (S-RES) AND CONSEQUENTLY TO ALLOW THE WRIT PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONERS, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:- ORDER

The petitioners are before this Court in this Review Petition seeking to review the order dated 10.08.2021 passed in W.P.No.12058/2021 (S-RES).

2. Learned counsel for the respondents files a memo dated 06.12.2021 enclosing the order dated 03.12.2021 whereby the order of suspension is reviewed and extended. In view of extension of the order of suspension by order dated 03.12.2021, it is open for the petitioners to challenge the said order. With the above observation, review petition stands disposed of. SD/- JUDGE NG* CT:bms

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial