D. Laxmamma Vs. S. Halappa

D. Laxmamma vs S. Halappa

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Nov 01, 2022

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1229506

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1229506
Court: Supreme Court of India
Judge: Hon'Ble the Chief Justice Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna
Decided On: Nov 01, 2022
Case Number: - 0
Subject: Right to Information
Source Link: https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2022/21276/21276_2022_1_1008_39368_Judgement_01-Nov-2022.pdf

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

D. Laxmamma

Advocate K. SARADA DEVI __

Respondent

S. Halappa

Excerpt

in the supreme court of india inherent jurisdiction review petition (civil)d.no.21276 of 2022 in civil appeal no.7512 of2012d. laxmamma …petitioner versus s. halappa and ors. …respondents order there is delay of 975 days in filing the review petition. the explanation offered in the application seeking condonation of delay is not satisfactory at all. we, therefore, refuse to condone delay. consequently, the instant review petition is dismissed on the ground of limitation. ………………………….cji. [uday umesh lalit]. ……………………………..j.[sanjiv khanna]. new delhi; 1st november, 2022.

Full Judgment

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL)D.No.21276 OF 2022 IN CIVIL APPEAL No.7512 OF2012D. LAXMAMMA …Petitioner Versus S. HALAPPA AND ORS. …Respondents ORDER

There is delay of 975 days in filing the Review Petition. The explanation offered in the application seeking condonation of delay is not satisfactory at all. We, therefore, refuse to condone delay. Consequently, the instant Review Petition is dismissed on the ground of limitation. ………………………….CJI. [Uday Umesh Lalit]. ……………………………..J.

[Sanjiv Khanna]. New Delhi; 1st November, 2022.

Same Court & Year Supreme Court of India · 2022 Same Parties D. Laxmamma vs S. Halappa Same Subject Right to Information Same Judge Hon'Ble the Chief Justice Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sanjiv Khanna