P. Chandrika Vs. The Commissioner Commissioner Of Urban Land Ceiling And Urban Land Tax

P. Chandrika vs The Commissioner Commissioner Of Urban Land Ceiling And Urban Land Tax

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Mar 15, 2022

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1228636

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1228636
Court: Supreme Court of India
Judge: Hon'Ble the Chief Justice Hon'Ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Hrishikesh Roy
Decided On: Mar 15, 2022
Case Number: R.P.(C) No.-000335-000335 - 2022
Subject: Other Taxes
Source Link: https://api.sci.gov.in/supremecourt/2022/4058/4058_2022_2_1002_34117_Judgement_15-Mar-2022.pdf

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Other Taxes

Key legal issue: Other Taxes

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

P. Chandrika

Advocate SUMIT R. SHARMA __

Respondent

The Commissioner Commissioner Of Urban Land Ceiling And Urban Land Tax

Excerpt

1 in the supreme court of india inherent jurisdiction review petition (civil) no.of2022(arising out of diary no.4058 of 2022) in special leave petition (civil)no.11094 of2019p. chandrika …appellant versus the commissioner, commissioner of urban land ceiling and urban land tax and anr. …respondents order delay in preferring review petition is condoned. application for listing review petition in open court is rejected. in proceedings initiated under the urban land ceiling act, 1978 the possession of excess urban land was taken over well before the repeal act came into force. in the premises, the writ petition filed by the present review petitioner was found to be without any substance and the claim was rejected by the division bench. the special leave petition arising therefrom was dismissed by this court. 2 we have gone through the review petition and the grounds raised in support thereof. we do not find any error apparent on record to justify interference. this review petition is, therefore, dismissed. ………………………………j.[uday umesh lalit]. ………………………………j.[s. ravindra bhat]. ………………………………j.[hrishikesh roy]. new delhi; march 15, 2022.

Full Judgment

1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (CIVIL) No.OF2022(Arising out of Diary No.4058 of 2022) IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL)NO.11094 OF2019P. CHANDRIKA …Appellant Versus THE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONER OF URBAN LAND CEILING AND URBAN LAND TAX AND ANR. …Respondents ORDER

Delay in preferring Review Petition is condoned. Application for listing Review Petition in open Court is rejected. In proceedings initiated under the Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1978 the possession of excess urban land was taken over well before the Repeal Act came into force. In the premises, the Writ Petition filed by the present Review Petitioner was found to be without any substance and the claim was rejected by the Division Bench. The Special Leave Petition arising therefrom was dismissed by this Court. 2 We have gone through the Review Petition and the grounds raised in support thereof. We do not find any error apparent on record to justify interference. This Review Petition is, therefore, dismissed. ………………………………J.

[Uday Umesh Lalit]. ………………………………J.

[S. Ravindra Bhat]. ………………………………J.

[Hrishikesh Roy]. New Delhi; March 15, 2022.

Same Court & Year Supreme Court of India · 2022 Same Parties P. Chandrika vs The Commissioner Commissioner Of Urban Land C... Same Subject Other Taxes Same Judge Hon'Ble the Chief Justice Hon'Ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bha...