Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Namit Kumar vs.state & Anr.

Namit Kumar vs State & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 14, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1225940

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue
Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Namit Kumar

Respondent

State & Anr.

Excerpt

.....offences punishable under sections 354 ipc and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. crl.m.c.5206/2019 page 1 of 3 4.5. notice issued. notice is accepted by learned app for the state and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. the present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.7. respondent no.2 is personally present in court with learned counsel and she has been identified by si satish kumar/io and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.8. the petitioner and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement by mutual consent.9. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioner any further.10. for the reasons afore-recorded, the fir no.134/2014 dated 16.02.2014, registered at ps - alipur, for the offences punishable under sections 354 ipc and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. crl.m.c.5206/2019 page 2 of 3 11. the petition is allowed accordingly.12. order dasti, under the signature of court master. (suresh kumar kait) judge october14 2019 ab crl.m.c.5206/2019 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:

14. 10.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5206/2019 NAMIT KUMAR ........ Petitioner

STATE & ANR. Through Mr.Lohit Ganguly, Adv. versus Through Mr.Kamal Kumar Ghai, APP for ........ RESPONDENTS

State. SI Satish Kumar EOW. Respondent no.2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT

(ORAL) CRL. M.A. 38040/2019 1.

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5206/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.134/2014 dated 16.02.2014, registered at PS - Alipur, for the offences punishable under Sections 354 IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom. CRL.M.C.5206/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.

5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.

7. Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court with learned counsel and she has been identified by SI Satish Kumar/IO and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

8. The petitioner and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement by mutual consent.

9. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioner any further.

10. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.134/2014 dated 16.02.2014, registered at PS - Alipur, for the offences punishable under Sections 354 IPC and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed. CRL.M.C.5206/2019 Page 2 of 3 11. The petition is allowed accordingly.

12. Order dasti, under the signature of Court Master. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE OCTOBER14 2019 ab CRL.M.C.5206/2019 Page 3 of 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial