Sh. Nitin vs.state & Anr

Sh. Nitin vs State & Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 05, 2018

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1218499

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1218499
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Oct 05, 2018
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sh. Nitin

Respondent

State & Anr

Excerpt

.....03.08.2018 has been executed.4.... petitioner is present in court in person. he has regretted his conduct and apologised to respondent no.2. he undertakes and assures that he shall not repeat his conduct in future. the undertaking is accepted.5. respondent no.2 is present in court in person and is identified by the investigating officer. she submits that she has settled the disputes with the petitioner and does not wish to prosecute the complaint any further and has no objection to the quashing of the subject fir.6. in view of the fact that the parties have resolved their disputes and respondent no.2 does not wish to press her complaint, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. it would be expedient to quash the subject crl .m.c. 5104/2018 page 2 of 3 fir and the consequent proceedings emanating there from.7. in view of the above, the petition is allowed. fir no.382 of 2016 under sections 354c/354-d/506/509 of the ipc registered at police station bharat nagar, delhi and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed, subject to the petitioner depositing costs of rs.7500/- with the “chief minister’s distress relief fund (cmdrf), kerala”, within a period of two weeks from today. receipt of deposit of the costs imposed by this order be furnished to the concerned investigating officer within a period of three weeks from today.8. order dasti under the signatures of the court master. october05 2018 ‘pallavi’ sanjeev sachdeva, j crl .m.c. 5104/2018 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~87 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:

05. 10.2018 CRL.M.C. 5104/2018 SH. NITIN versus STATE & ANR ........ Petitioner

........ RESPONDENTS

Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: Mr.Neetu Bagri, Advocate with petitioner in person. For the... RESPONDENTS

: Mr.Hirein Sharma, APP for State with SI Kuldeep, PS Bharat Nagar CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT0510.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 33657/2018 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 5104/2018 & Crl. M.A. 33658/2018 1.... Petitioner

seeks quashing of FIR No.382 of 2016 under Sections 354C/354-D/506/509 of the IPC registered at Police Station Bharat Nagar, Delhi, based on a settlement. Subject FIR was registered consequent to the complaint lodged 2. Crl .M.C. 5104/2018 Page 1 of 3 by respondent No.2 alleging that the petitioner, who has known to her for the last
months, was sending obscene messages and threatening her and her family members.

3. Learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have settled their disputes through the process of mediation held at Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini Courts and Settlement Agreement dated 03.08.2018 has been executed.

4.... Petitioner

is present in Court in person. He has regretted his conduct and apologised to respondent No.2. He undertakes and assures that he shall not repeat his conduct in future. The undertaking is accepted.

5. Respondent No.2 is present in Court in person and is identified by the Investigating Officer. She submits that she has settled the disputes with the petitioner and does not wish to prosecute the complaint any further and has no objection to the quashing of the subject FIR.

6. In view of the fact that the parties have resolved their disputes and respondent No.2 does not wish to press her complaint, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is restored; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. It would be expedient to quash the subject Crl .M.C. 5104/2018 Page 2 of 3 FIR and the consequent proceedings emanating there from.

7. In view of the above, the petition is allowed. FIR No.382 of 2016 under Sections 354C/354-D/506/509 of the IPC registered at Police Station Bharat Nagar, Delhi and the consequent proceedings emanating there from are quashed, subject to the petitioner depositing costs of Rs.7500/- with the “Chief Minister’s Distress Relief Fund (CMDRF), Kerala”, within a period of two weeks from today. Receipt of deposit of the costs imposed by this Order be furnished to the concerned Investigating Officer within a period of three weeks from today.

8. Order Dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. OCTOBER05 2018 ‘pallavi’ SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J Crl .M.C. 5104/2018 Page 3 of 3

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Sh. Nitin vs State & Anr Same Subject MRTP