Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Suninder Sandha vs.m/s Concept Horizon Infra Private Limited & Ors

Suninder Sandha vs M/S Concept Horizon Infra Private Limited & Ors

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 03, 2018
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1218387

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Arbitration

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Arbitration

Key legal issue
Arbitration

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Suninder Sandha

Respondent

M/S Concept Horizon Infra Private Limited & Ors

Excerpt

$~34 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi % + crl.m.c. 3941/2018 judgment delivered on:03.10.2018 suninder sandha ........ petitioner versus m/s concept horizon infra private limited & ors ........ respondents advocates who appeared in this case: for the... petitioner : mr. jatin sehgal, mr. adhirath singh & mr. viren bansal, advocates. for the... respondents : coram:-"hon’ble mr justice sanjeev sachdeva mr. saket sikri & mr. ajay pal singh, advocates. judgment0310.2018 sanjeev sachdeva, j.(oral) 1. the petitioner seeks a direction to the trial court to expedite the disposal of the complaint case filed by the petitioner.2. learned counsel for the respondents submits that insofar as the prayer for expeditious disposal is concerned, he has no objection to the same, however, he denies the factual averments made in the petition and submits that parties are already in arbitration and further, as per the respondent no case is made out and he reserves his right to crl.m.c. 3941/2018 page 1 of 2 take appropriate steps inter alia for quashing of the subject complaint.3. in view of the above, the trial court is directed to expedite the disposal of the complaint and endeavour to dispose of the same preferably within a period of six months. list the matter before the trial court, on 23rd october, 2018, for fixing a schedule for expeditious disposal.4. it is clarified that this order shall be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties before the arbitral tribunal and also shall be without prejudice to the right, if any, of the respondents to seek quashing of the subject complaint. it is further clarified that this court has neither considered nor opined on the merits of the case of the either parties. the petition is disposed of with the above directions. order dasti under the signatures of the court master.5. 6. october03 2018 ‘aa’ sanjeev sachdeva, j crl.m.c. 3941/2018 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~34 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + CRL.M.C. 3941/2018 Judgment delivered on:03.10.2018 SUNINDER SANDHA ........ Petitioner

versus M/S CONCEPT HORIZON INFRA PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS

Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: Mr. Jatin Sehgal, Mr. Adhirath Singh & Mr. Viren Bansal, Advocates. For the... RESPONDENTS

: CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA Mr. Saket Sikri & Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, Advocates. JUDGMENT0310.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1. The petitioner seeks a direction to the trial court to expedite the disposal of the complaint case filed by the petitioner.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that insofar as the prayer for expeditious disposal is concerned, he has no objection to the same, however, he denies the factual averments made in the petition and submits that parties are already in arbitration and further, as per the respondent no case is made out and he reserves his right to CRL.M.C. 3941/2018 Page 1 of 2 take appropriate steps inter alia for quashing of the subject complaint.

3. In view of the above, the trial court is directed to expedite the disposal of the complaint and endeavour to dispose of the same preferably within a period of six months. List the matter before the trial court, on 23rd October, 2018, for fixing a schedule for expeditious disposal.

4. It is clarified that this order shall be without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the parties before the Arbitral Tribunal and also shall be without prejudice to the right, if any, of the respondents to seek quashing of the subject complaint. It is further clarified that this court has neither considered nor opined on the merits of the case of the either parties. The petition is disposed of with the above directions. Order dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.

5. 6. OCTOBER03 2018 ‘AA’ SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J CRL.M.C. 3941/2018 Page 2 of 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial