Jitendera Gaba vs.delhi Pollution Control Committee

Jitendera Gaba vs Delhi Pollution Control Committee

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Jun 01, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1215545

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1215545
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Jun 01, 2018
Subject: Environment

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Environment

Key legal issue: Environment

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jitendera Gaba

Respondent

Delhi Pollution Control Committee

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of order: june 01, 2018 + w.p.(c) 6369/2018 & cm no.24499/2018 jitendera gaba ........ petitioner through : mr. divyakant lahoti and mr. parikshit ahuja, advocates versus delhi pollution control committee ..... respondent through : mr. biraga mahapatra and mr. t. k. nayak, advocates with mr. dinesh jindal, l.o, dpcc coram: hon'ble mr. justice sunil gaur order (oral) 1. for the reliefs sought in this petition, a representation (annexure p-29) was made by petitioner on 16th april, 2018 but according to petitioner’s counsel there is no response. learned counsel for respondent submits that a speaking response to the representation (annexure p-29) would be made within a period of six weeks.2. while taking on record aforesaid undertaking given on behalf of respondent, this petition and the application are disposed of with a direction to respondent to convey the fate of the representation to petitioner within six weeks, so that petitioner may avail of the remedies as available in law, if need be. w.p.(c) 6369/2018 page 1 of 2 3. with the aforesaid direction, this petition and the application are accordingly disposed of. copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for the parties. june01 2018 srwt (sunil gaur) judge w.p.(c) 6369/2018 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: June 01, 2018 + W.P.(C) 6369/2018 & CM No.24499/2018 JITENDERA GABA ........ Petitioner

Through : Mr. Divyakant Lahoti and Mr. Parikshit Ahuja, Advocates versus DELHI POLLUTION CONTROL COMMITTEE ..... Respondent Through : Mr. Biraga Mahapatra and Mr. T. K. Nayak, Advocates with Mr. Dinesh Jindal, L.O, DPCC CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER

(ORAL) 1. For the reliefs sought in this petition, a Representation (Annexure P-29) was made by petitioner on 16th April, 2018 but according to petitioner’s counsel there is no response. Learned counsel for respondent submits that a speaking response to the Representation (Annexure P-29) would be made within a period of six weeks.

2. While taking on record aforesaid undertaking given on behalf of respondent, this petition and the application are disposed of with a direction to respondent to convey the fate of the Representation to petitioner within six weeks, so that petitioner may avail of the remedies as available in law, if need be. W.P.(C) 6369/2018 Page 1 of 2 3. With the aforesaid direction, this petition and the application are accordingly disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti to learned counsel for the parties. JUNE01 2018 SRwt (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE W.P.(C) 6369/2018 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Jitendera Gaba vs Delhi Pollution Control Committee Same Subject Environment