Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Express Housekeeper Private Limited vs.three C Universal Developers Private Limted

Express Housekeeper Private Limited vs Three C Universal Developers Private Limted

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Aug 24, 2017
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1208222

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Arbitration

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Arbitration

Key legal issue
Arbitration

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Express Housekeeper Private Limited

Respondent

Three C Universal Developers Private Limted

Excerpt

.....arisen, shall be referred to a mutually acceptable sole arbitrator within a period of ten (10) days thereafter. in case the parties are unable to agree upon the sole arbitrator, then both parties shall appoint one arbitrator each, and the two (2) arbitrators so appointed shall appoint the third (3rd) arbitrator. the arbitration proceedings shall be held in new delhi, in arb. pet.417 /2017 page 2 of 4 english language and in accordance with the provisions of the arbitration & conciliation act, 1996 and the rules made thereunder, as statutorily amended. modified, replaced, substituted or re-numbered from time to time.” 6. the petitioner has invoked the arbitration clause by notice dated 17.02.2017.7. learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent has no objection to the appointment of an independent sole arbitrator.8. in view of the above, mr anupam srivastava, advocate, (mobile number 9811032151), is appointed as the sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. this is subject to the arbitrator making the necessary disclosures under section 12 of the act of not being ineligible under section 12(5) of the act.9. the arbitrator shall adjudicate the claims of the petitioner and the counter claims, if any of the respondents.10. the fee of the arbitrator shall be as per the fee schedule of the delhi international arbitration centre.11. the parties are at liberty to approach the learned arbitrator for arb. pet.417 /2017 page 3 of 4 elucidating the necessary disclosures and for further proceedings.12. the petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms.13. order dasti under signatures of the court master. august24 2017 ‘sn’ sanjeev sachdeva, j arb. pet.417 /2017 page 4 of 4

Full Judgment

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on:

24. 08.2017 ARB.P. 417/2017 + EXPRESS HOUSEKEEPER PRIVATE LIMITED ........ Petitioner

versus THREE C UNIVERSAL DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMTED ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

For the Respondent : Mr T.L.Garg and Mr Rohan Garg : Mr Mahjabeen Tanweer CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2408.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1. By this petition, under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), the petitioner seeks appointment of a sole independent arbitrator.

2. The respondent had approached the petitioner to provide Housekeeping, manpower and other support services at the Three C Universal Developers (UD) Sites of the petitioner. ARB. PET.417 /2017 Page 1 of 4 3. Agreement dated 01.04.2012 was entered into between the parties. After the expiry of the term of the said agreement, the term was extended by execution of subsequent agreements inter alia dated 25.04.2014 and 21.04.2015.

4. As per the petitioner, certain Bills of the petitioner have remained unpaid leading to the disputes between the parties.

5. The Arbitration Clause agreed to between the parties, as contained in the Agreement dated 01.04.2012 which is in identical terms to the arbitration clause contained in the subsequent agreements reads as under:-

"“Settlement of Dispute Any disputes and differences arising out of or relating to this Agreement including interpretation of its terms will be resolved through joint discussions of THREE C UD and EHKPL. Any dispute, difference or question that is not resolved through joint discussions, within 15 (fifteen) days of its having arisen, shall be referred to a mutually acceptable sole arbitrator within a period of ten (10) days thereafter. In case the parties are unable to agree upon the Sole Arbitrator, then both parties shall appoint one Arbitrator each, and the two (2) arbitrators so appointed shall appoint the third (3rd) arbitrator. The arbitration proceedings shall be held in New Delhi, in ARB. PET.417 /2017 Page 2 of 4 English language and in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 and the rules made thereunder, as statutorily amended. Modified, replaced, substituted or re-numbered from time to time.” 6. The petitioner has invoked the arbitration clause by notice dated 17.02.2017.

7. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that the respondent has no objection to the appointment of an independent Sole Arbitrator.

8. In view of the above, Mr Anupam Srivastava, Advocate, (Mobile Number 9811032151), is appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties. This is subject to the Arbitrator making the necessary disclosures under Section 12 of the Act of not being ineligible under Section 12(5) of the Act.

9. The Arbitrator shall adjudicate the claims of the petitioner and the counter claims, if any of the respondents.

10. The fee of the Arbitrator shall be as per the Fee Schedule of the Delhi International Arbitration Centre.

11. The parties are at liberty to approach the learned Arbitrator for ARB. PET.417 /2017 Page 3 of 4 elucidating the necessary disclosures and for further proceedings.

12. The petition is accordingly disposed of in the above terms.

13. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. AUGUST24 2017 ‘Sn’ SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J ARB. PET.417 /2017 Page 4 of 4

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial