Uoi & Ors. Vs.programme Staff Association & Ors

Uoi & Ors. vs Programme Staff Association & Ors

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Jul 13, 2017

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1206883

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1206883
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Jul 13, 2017
Subject: Service

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service

Key legal issue: Service

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Uoi & Ors.

Respondent

Programme Staff Association & Ors

Excerpt

.....staff association & ors ........ respondents through : mr. sudesh verma with ms. nikita parmar, advocate for r-1. dr. ashwani bhardwaj, advocate for r-2. mr. amandeep joshi, advocate for r-3. coram: hon'ble ms. justice hima kohli hon'ble ms. justice deepa sharma % proxy counsel appearing for mr. rajeev sharma, counsel for the order1307.2017 petitioners states that pursuant to the order dated 13.4.2017, learned counsel has received a communication from prasar bharti, directorate general, all india radio dated 12.7.2017 to the effect that two acps have to be granted to the programme executives, as per the instructions of the dopt. copies of the two letters dated 12.7.2017 and a letter dated 12.11.2015 are handed over by the counsel for the petitioners and are taken on record, with copies furnished to the counsels for the respondents.2. learned counsel for the petitioners further clarifies that condition no.13 annexed to om dated 9.8.1999 and clarification no.35 issued in w.p.(c) 4151/2003 page 1 of 2 respect of om dated 18.7.2000, as mentioned in the impugned judgment, shall be given effect to qua the respondents.3. counsels for the respondents states that they are satisfied with the aforesaid submission. they however requests that the payments towards the grant of acps may be released in favour of the respondents in a time-bound manner.4. counsel for the petitioners states that it shall take six months for the payments towards grant of acps to be released to the respondents.5. on an undertaking given by the petitioners that they shall abide by the timeline noted above for release of the payments due and payable to the respondents towards grant of acps in terms of the impugned judgment the present petition is disposed of. file be consigned to the record room. hima kohli, j deepa sharma, j july13 2017 sk/ap w.p.(c) 4151/2003 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4151/2003 1. UOI & ORS. Through : Ms. Radha Lakshmi, proxy counsel for Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate with Mr. Surjit Singh, UDC ........ Petitioner

versus PROGRAMME STAFF ASSOCIATION & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS

Through : Mr. Sudesh Verma with Ms. Nikita Parmar, Advocate for R-1. Dr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, Advocate for R-2. Mr. Amandeep Joshi, Advocate for R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA % Proxy counsel appearing for Mr. Rajeev Sharma, counsel for the ORDER

1307.2017 petitioners states that pursuant to the order dated 13.4.2017, learned counsel has received a communication from Prasar Bharti, Directorate General, All India Radio dated 12.7.2017 to the effect that two ACPs have to be granted to the Programme Executives, as per the instructions of the DOPT. Copies of the two letters dated 12.7.2017 and a letter dated 12.11.2015 are handed over by the counsel for the petitioners and are taken on record, with copies furnished to the counsels for the respondents.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners further clarifies that Condition No.13 annexed to OM dated 9.8.1999 and Clarification No.35 issued in W.P.(C) 4151/2003 Page 1 of 2 respect of OM dated 18.7.2000, as mentioned in the impugned judgment, shall be given effect to qua the respondents.

3. Counsels for the respondents states that they are satisfied with the aforesaid submission. They however requests that the payments towards the grant of ACPs may be released in favour of the respondents in a time-bound manner.

4. Counsel for the petitioners states that it shall take six months for the payments towards grant of ACPs to be released to the respondents.

5. On an undertaking given by the petitioners that they shall abide by the timeline noted above for release of the payments due and payable to the respondents towards grant of ACPs in terms of the impugned judgment the present petition is disposed of. File be consigned to the record room. HIMA KOHLI, J DEEPA SHARMA, J JULY13 2017 sk/ap W.P.(C) 4151/2003 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2017 Same Parties Uoi & Ors. vs Programme Staff Association & Ors Same Subject Service