Neeta Amar vs.vipul Amar

Neeta Amar vs Vipul Amar

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided May 26, 2017

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1206302

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1206302
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: May 26, 2017
Subject: Right to Information

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Neeta Amar

Advocate Mr. Navin Sharma, Mr. K. C. Jain

Respondent

Vipul Amar

Advocate Ms. Geeta Luthra, Mr. Jai Bansal, Mr. Anshul Duggal, Mr. Tribikram Meelee

Excerpt

.....and mr. tribikram meelee, advocates. coram: hon'ble ms. justice hima kohli hon'ble ms. justice sangita dhingra sehgal order2605.2017 % cm appl. no.20637/2017 (extension of time) 1. this application has been filed by the respondent/husband praying inter alia for extension of time for depositing the arrears of maintenance payable w.e.f. september, 2016 to april, 2017, as ordered on 02.05.2017.2. vide order dated 02.05.2017, the respondent was directed to deposit the entire arrears of maintenance in the account of the appellant w.e.f. september, 2016 till april, 2017 within four weeks and further, he was directed to continue paying maintenance @ rs.35,000 p.m. to the appellant effective from the month of may, 2017.3. learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent states that the arrears of maintenance reckoned from september, 2016 to april, 2017 totals to a sum of rs. 2,80,000/-. the respondent undertakes to deposit a sum of rs.1,50,000/- directly into the account of the appellant on or before mat. app. (f.c.) 178/2016 page 1 of 2 31.05.2017 and the balance amount of rs.1,30,000/- on or before 30.06.2017.4. learned counsel for the appellant states on instructions from the appellant that he has no objection to the aforesaid request on the condition that the respondent strictly adheres to the timeline mentioned in the present application.5. for the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. the respondent is permitted to deposit a sum of rs.1,50,000/- directly into the account of the appellant on or before 31.05.2017 and the balance amount of rs.1,30,000/- on or before 30.06.2017. in the event of any default on the part of the respondent, the appellant shall be at liberty to approach the court for relief.6. the application is disposed of. may26 2017 gr hima kohli, j sangita dhingra sehgal, j mat. app. (f.c.) 178/2016 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI $~17 * + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 178/2016 NEETA AMAR ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Navin Sharma and Mr. K. C. Jain, Advocates. VIPUL AMAR versus ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Geeta Luthra, Senior Advocate with Mr. Jai Bansal, Mr. Anshul Duggal, Mr.Sudhir Kumar and Mr. Tribikram Meelee, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL ORDER

2605.2017 % CM APPL. No.20637/2017 (Extension of time) 1. This application has been filed by the respondent/husband praying inter alia for extension of time for depositing the arrears of maintenance payable w.e.f. September, 2016 to April, 2017, as ordered on 02.05.2017.

2. Vide order dated 02.05.2017, the respondent was directed to deposit the entire arrears of maintenance in the account of the appellant w.e.f. September, 2016 till April, 2017 within four weeks and further, he was directed to continue paying maintenance @ Rs.35,000 p.m. to the appellant effective from the month of May, 2017.

3. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent states that the arrears of maintenance reckoned from September, 2016 to April, 2017 totals to a sum of Rs. 2,80,000/-. The respondent undertakes to deposit a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- directly into the account of the appellant on or before MAT. APP. (F.C.) 178/2016 Page 1 of 2 31.05.2017 and the balance amount of Rs.1,30,000/- on or before 30.06.2017.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant states on instructions from the appellant that he has no objection to the aforesaid request on the condition that the respondent strictly adheres to the timeline mentioned in the present application.

5. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. The respondent is permitted to deposit a sum of Rs.1,50,000/- directly into the account of the appellant on or before 31.05.2017 and the balance amount of Rs.1,30,000/- on or before 30.06.2017. In the event of any default on the part of the respondent, the appellant shall be at liberty to approach the Court for relief.

6. The application is disposed of. MAY26 2017 gr HIMA KOHLI, J SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J MAT. APP. (F.C.) 178/2016 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2017 Same Parties Neeta Amar vs Vipul Amar Same Subject Right to Information