Raj Rani vs.uoi and Ors

Raj Rani vs Uoi and Ors

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided May 08, 2017

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1205820

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1205820
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: May 08, 2017
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Raj Rani

Advocate Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Mr. Vivek Goyal, Mr. Pradeep Verma

Respondent

Uoi and Ors

Excerpt

in the high court of delhi at new delhi raj rani $~17 * + w.p.(c) 7726/2011 uoi and ors versus through: mr. vinod sehrawat, advocate. ........ petitioner through: mr. vivek goyal, advocate for uoi. mr. pradeep verma, advocate for r-3. ........ respondents coram: hon'ble ms. justice hima kohli hon'ble ms. justice sangita dhingra sehgal % order0805.2017 1. learned counsel for the respondent no.3 states that the petitioner has expired as long back as in november, 2014 but no steps have been taken by her legal heirs till date to seek substitution in the present petition.2. a perusal of the paper book and the order sheets effective from 16.10.2014 shows that in all this while, learned counsel for the petitioner herein has not taken any steps to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner.3. learned counsel for the petitioner states that he did file an application to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner, but he is neither in a position to furnish the date on which he had moved such an application, nor is the date on which he claimed that he had furnished a copy to the other side, available with him. we have requested him to hand over his own copy wp(c) 7726/2011 page 1 of 2 of the application, but on rummaging through his file, he submits that it is not available.4. in such circumstances, we have no option but to dismiss the present petition, the same having abated on the demise of the petitioner. ordered accordingly. may08 2017 ap/mk hima kohli, j sangita dhingra sehgal, j wp(c) 7726/2011 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RAJ RANI $~17 * + W.P.(C) 7726/2011 UOI AND ORS versus Through: Mr. Vinod Sehrawat, Advocate. ........ Petitioner

Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Pradeep Verma, Advocate for R-3. ........ RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL % ORDER

0805.2017 1. Learned counsel for the respondent No.3 states that the petitioner has expired as long back as in November, 2014 but no steps have been taken by her legal heirs till date to seek substitution in the present petition.

2. A perusal of the paper book and the order sheets effective from 16.10.2014 shows that in all this while, learned counsel for the petitioner herein has not taken any steps to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he did file an application to bring on record the legal heirs of the deceased petitioner, but he is neither in a position to furnish the date on which he had moved such an application, nor is the date on which he claimed that he had furnished a copy to the other side, available with him. We have requested him to hand over his own copy WP(C) 7726/2011 Page 1 of 2 of the application, but on rummaging through his file, he submits that it is not available.

4. In such circumstances, we have no option but to dismiss the present petition, the same having abated on the demise of the petitioner. Ordered accordingly. MAY08 2017 ap/mk HIMA KOHLI, J SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J WP(C) 7726/2011 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2017 Same Parties Raj Rani vs Uoi and Ors Same Subject Education