Manmohan vs.ekta

Manmohan vs Ekta

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Apr 27, 2017

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1205619

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1205619
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Apr 27, 2017
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Manmohan

Respondent

Ekta

Excerpt

$~12 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi + mat.app.(f.c.) 29/2017 & cm appl. nos.6753-6754/2017 through: mr. vishal bansal, advocate. through: manmohan ekta versus nemo. ..... respondent ..... appellant coram: hon'ble ms. justice hima kohli hon'ble ms. justice sangita dhingra sehgal the appellant/husband is aggrieved by an order dated 07.12.2016 passed by order2704.2017 % 1. the learned principal judge, family court, north-east delhi whereunder, he has been directed to pay a sum of rs.20,000/- per month as maintenance to the respondent/wife and minor child w.e.f. 23.04.2016 on a month to month basis. he was further directed to pay a sum of rs.11,000/- to the respondent/wife towards litigation expenses incurred by her.2. learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition while reserving his right to appear before the executing court in the execution proceedings initiated against her by the respondent/wife for recovery of money in terms of the impugned order dated 07.12.2016. leave as prayed for, is granted.3. the petition is disposed of along with all the pending applications. april27 2017/gr mat. app. (f.c.) 29/2017 hima kohli, j sangita dhingra sehgal, j page 1 of 1

Full Judgment

$~12 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 29/2017 & CM APPL. Nos.6753-6754/2017 Through: Mr. Vishal Bansal, Advocate. Through: MANMOHAN EKTA versus Nemo. ..... Respondent ..... Appellant CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL The appellant/husband is aggrieved by an order dated 07.12.2016 passed by ORDER

2704.2017 % 1. the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, North-East Delhi whereunder, he has been directed to pay a sum of Rs.20,000/- per month as maintenance to the respondent/wife and minor child w.e.f. 23.04.2016 on a month to month basis. He was further directed to pay a sum of Rs.11,000/- to the respondent/wife towards litigation expenses incurred by her.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition while reserving his right to appear before the executing court in the execution proceedings initiated against her by the respondent/wife for recovery of money in terms of the impugned order dated 07.12.2016. Leave as prayed for, is granted.

3. The petition is disposed of along with all the pending applications. APRIL27 2017/gr MAT. APP. (F.C.) 29/2017 HIMA KOHLI, J SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J Page 1 of 1

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2017 Same Parties Manmohan vs Ekta Same Subject MRTP