Shabnam vs.usman Ali and Anr

Shabnam vs Usman Ali and Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Mar 20, 2017

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1204969

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1204969
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Mar 20, 2017
Subject: Narcotics

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Narcotics

Key legal issue: Narcotics

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shabnam

Advocate Mr. P. Suresh

Respondent

Usman Ali and Anr

Excerpt

$~5. * + 1. in the high court of delhi at new delhi rfa1432017 and cm appl. 5216/2017, 5218/2017 shabnam through: mr. p. suresh, advocate ..... appellant versus usman ali and anr through: none ........ respondents coram: hon'ble ms. justice hima kohli % the appellant/plaintiff is aggrieved by the order dated 24.09.2016 order2003.2017 passed by the learned trial court rejecting her suit for partition and permanent injunction instituted against her siblings, on an application filed by the respondents/defendants under order vii rule 11 cpc.2. on the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the appellant had sought an adjournment on the ground that he was not prepared with the brief. today, he states on instructions that the appellant does not wish to press the present appeal on merits and requests that only a limited notice may be issued to the respondents to enable the parties, who are siblings, to sit across the table and negotiate a settlement, if possible.3. while disposing of the present appeal alongwith the pending applications, on the appellant filing the process fee within one week, by ordinary process and speed post, limited notice is issued to the respondents, rfa1432017 page 1 of 2 calling upon them to state if they would be ready and willing to mediate their dispute with the appellant/plaintiff, returnable on 14.07.2017. march20 2017 rkb hima kohli, j rfa1432017 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~5. * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RFA1432017 and CM APPL. 5216/2017, 5218/2017 SHABNAM Through: Mr. P. Suresh, Advocate ..... Appellant versus USMAN ALI AND ANR Through: None ........ RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI % The appellant/plaintiff is aggrieved by the order dated 24.09.2016 ORDER

2003.2017 passed by the learned trial court rejecting her suit for partition and permanent injunction instituted against her siblings, on an application filed by the respondents/defendants under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

2. On the last date of hearing, learned counsel for the appellant had sought an adjournment on the ground that he was not prepared with the brief. Today, he states on instructions that the appellant does not wish to press the present appeal on merits and requests that only a limited notice may be issued to the respondents to enable the parties, who are siblings, to sit across the table and negotiate a settlement, if possible.

3. While disposing of the present appeal alongwith the pending applications, on the appellant filing the process fee within one week, by ordinary process and speed post, limited notice is issued to the respondents, RFA1432017 Page 1 of 2 calling upon them to state if they would be ready and willing to mediate their dispute with the appellant/plaintiff, returnable on 14.07.2017. MARCH20 2017 rkb HIMA KOHLI, J RFA1432017 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2017 Same Parties Shabnam vs Usman Ali and Anr Same Subject Narcotics