Skip to content


The State of Uttarakhand State of Uttarakhand Vs. Mahendra Singh . - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation

Court

Supreme Court of India

Decided On

Source Link

http://sci.gov.in//supremecourt/2007/14879/14879_2007_Judgement_09-Aug-2017.pdf

Case Number

14879 / 2007

Judge

Appellant

The State of Uttarakhand State of Uttarakhand

Respondent

Mahendra Singh .

Appellant Advocate

Anuvrat Sharma

Respondent Advocate

Sakshi Kakkar

Excerpt:


.....of2010state of uttarakhand appellant(s) versus mahendra singh & ors. respondent(s) civil appeal no.10648 of2010judgment kurian, j.in the peculiar facts of these cases where an 1. employee has been continuing in service for the last more than 20 years, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the high court. the civil appeals are, accordingly, dismissed, 2. however, leaving the question of law open. no costs. new delhi; august 09, 2017. .......................j.[ kurian joseph ]. .......................j.[ r. banumathi ]. item no.105 court no.6 section x s u p r e m e c o u r t o f i n d i a record of proceedings civil appeal no(s). 10647/2010 appellant(s) state of uttarakhand versus mahendra singh . & ors. respondent(s) (exemption from filing o.t.) with c.a. no.10648/2010 (x) date :09. 08-2017 these appeals were called on for hearing today. coram : hon'ble mr. justice kurian joseph hon'ble mrs. justice r. banumathi counsel for the parties mr. bhuvneshwari pathak, adv. ms. shilpi satyapriya satyam, adv. mr. rahul kaushik, aor mr. prateek rusia, adv. ms. savita devi, adv. ms. sakshi kakkar, aor mr. anuvrat sharma, aor mohd. irshad hanif, aor mr. radha.....

Judgment:


NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 10647 OF2010STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Appellant(s) VERSUS MAHENDRA SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) CIVIL APPEAL No.10648 OF2010

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

In the peculiar facts of these cases where an 1. employee has been continuing in service for the last more than 20 years, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court. The civil appeals are, accordingly, dismissed, 2. however, leaving the question of law open. No costs. New Delhi; August 09, 2017. .......................J.

[ KURIAN JOSEPH ]. .......................J.

[ R. BANUMATHI ]. ITEM NO.105 COURT NO.6 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 10647/2010 Appellant(s) STATE OF UTTARAKHAND VERSUS MAHENDRA SINGH . & ORS. Respondent(s) (EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) WITH C.A. No.10648/2010 (X) Date :

09. 08-2017 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI Counsel for the parties Mr. Bhuvneshwari Pathak, Adv. Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Adv. Mr. Rahul Kaushik, AOR Mr. Prateek Rusia, Adv. Ms. Savita Devi, Adv. Ms. Sakshi Kakkar, AOR Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, AOR Mohd. Irshad Hanif, AOR Mr. Radha Shyam Jena, AOR ORDER

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following The civil appeals are dismissed in terms of the signed non-reportable Judgment. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. (JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER (Signed non-reportable Judgment is placed on the file)


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //