The State of Uttarakhand State of Uttarakhand Vs. Mahendra Singh .

The State of Uttarakhand State of Uttarakhand vs Mahendra Singh .

Type Court Judgment Court Supreme Court of India Decided Aug 09, 2017

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1193417

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1193417
Court: Supreme Court of India
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi
Decided On: Aug 09, 2017
Case Number: 14879 / 2007
Subject: Right to Information
Source Link: http://sci.gov.in//supremecourt/2007/14879/14879_2007_Judgement_09-Aug-2017.pdf

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Right to Information

Key legal issue: Right to Information

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

The State of Uttarakhand State of Uttarakhand

Advocate Anuvrat Sharma

Respondent

Mahendra Singh .

Advocate Sakshi Kakkar

Excerpt

non-reportable in the supreme court of india civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal no(s). 10647 of 2010 state of uttarakhand appellant(s) versus mahendra singh & ors. respondent(s) civil appeal no.10648 of2010judgmentkurian, j.in the peculiar facts of these cases where an 1. employee has been continuing in service for the last more than 20 years, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the high court. the civil appeals are, accordingly, dismissed, 2. however, leaving the question of law open. no costs. new delhi; august 09, 2017. .......................j.[ kurian joseph ]. .......................j.[ r. banumathi ]. item no.105 court no.6 section x s u p r e m e c o u r t o f i n d i a record of proceedings civil appeal no(s). 10647/2010 appellant(s) state of uttarakhand versus mahendra singh . & ors. respondent(s) (exemption from filing o.t.) with c.a. no.10648/2010 (x) date :09. 08-2017 these appeals were called on for hearing today. coram : hon'ble mr. justice kurian joseph hon'ble mrs. justice r. banumathi counsel for the parties mr. bhuvneshwari pathak, adv. ms. shilpi satyapriya satyam, adv. mr. rahul kaushik, aor mr. prateek rusia, adv. ms. savita devi, adv. ms. sakshi kakkar, aor mr. anuvrat sharma, aor mohd. irshad hanif, aor mr. radha shyam jena, aor order upon hearing the counsel the court made the following the civil appeals are dismissed in terms of the signed non-reportable judgment. pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. (jayant kumar arora) (suman jain) court master court master (signed non-reportable judgment is placed on the file)

Full Judgment

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 10647 OF 2010 STATE OF UTTARAKHAND Appellant(s) VERSUS MAHENDRA SINGH & ORS. Respondent(s) CIVIL APPEAL No.10648 OF2010

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

In the peculiar facts of these cases where an 1. employee has been continuing in service for the last more than 20 years, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court. The civil appeals are, accordingly, dismissed, 2. however, leaving the question of law open. No costs. New Delhi; August 09, 2017. .......................J.

[ KURIAN JOSEPH ]. .......................J.

[ R. BANUMATHI ]. ITEM NO.105 COURT NO.6 SECTION X S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Civil Appeal No(s). 10647/2010 Appellant(s) STATE OF UTTARAKHAND VERSUS MAHENDRA SINGH . & ORS. Respondent(s) (EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T.) WITH C.A. No.10648/2010 (X) Date :

09. 08-2017 These appeals were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUMATHI Counsel for the parties Mr. Bhuvneshwari Pathak, Adv. Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Adv. Mr. Rahul Kaushik, AOR Mr. Prateek Rusia, Adv. Ms. Savita Devi, Adv. Ms. Sakshi Kakkar, AOR Mr. Anuvrat Sharma, AOR Mohd. Irshad Hanif, AOR Mr. Radha Shyam Jena, AOR ORDER

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following The civil appeals are dismissed in terms of the signed non-reportable Judgment. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. (JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (SUMAN JAIN) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER (Signed non-reportable Judgment is placed on the file)

Same Court & Year Supreme Court of India · 2017 Same Parties The State of Uttarakhand State of Uttarakhand vs Mahendra Sin... Same Subject Right to Information Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Kurian Joseph, Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice R. Ba...