Mary Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul and Another

Mary vs The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Feb 23, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1192455

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1192455
Court: Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge: P.N. Prakash
Decided On: Feb 23, 2016
Case Number: Crl.O.P.(MD) No. 3192 of 2016
Subject: MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue: MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mary

Respondent

The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul and Another

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the respondents to register a criminal case against the accused based on the complaint dated 03.02.2016 preferred by the petitioner and to take action against the accused in accordance with law and pass such further or other orders as this honble court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and thus render justice.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the respondents to register a criminal case against the accused based on the complaint dated 03.02.2016 preferred by the petitioner and to take action against the accused in accordance with law. 2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned government advocate (crl.side), who would submit that the complaint dated 03.02.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents. 3. in view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 03.02.2016. on receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence or drop action otherwise. with the above direction, this criminal original petition is disposed of.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the respondents to register a criminal case against the accused based on the complaint dated 03.02.2016 preferred by the petitioner and to take action against the accused in accordance with law and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and thus render justice.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the respondents to register a criminal case against the accused based on the complaint dated 03.02.2016 preferred by the petitioner and to take action against the accused in accordance with law.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side), who would submit that the complaint dated 03.02.2016 has been sent by post to the respondents.

3. In view of the above submission, the petitioner is directed to appear in person before the 2^nd respondent along with this order and lodge a fresh complaint, containing the very same contents as stated in the previous complaint dated 03.02.2016. On receipt of such complaint, the same shall be enquired into and action be taken thereon in accordance with law, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence or drop action otherwise.

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Same Court & Year Chennai Madurai · 2016 Same Parties Mary vs The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul and Another Same Subject MRTP Same Judge P.N. Prakash