Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

R. Krishnan Vs. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul and Others

R. Krishnan vs The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Madurai Decided Feb 26, 2016
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1192389

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Madurai High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl. O.P. (MD) No. 3473 of 2016
Subject
MRTP

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

MRTP

Key legal issue
MRTP

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

R. Krishnan

Respondent

The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul and Others

Excerpt

(prayer: criminal original petition filed under section 482 of cr.p.c., praying to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to award adequate police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner.) 1. this petition has been filed to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to award adequate police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner. 2. when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned government advocate (crl.side) would submit that on a complaint given by the petitioner, petitioner enquiry is pending in csr no.38 of 2016. 3. under such circumstances, the police should conduct thorough enquiry in csr no.38 of 2016 and during enquiry, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence against the opposite party, respondent police shall take appropriate action and give protection to the life and limb of the petitioner. with the above observation, this criminal original petition is closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to award adequate police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner.)

1. This petition has been filed to direct the 3rd and 4th respondents to award adequate police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner.

2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that on a complaint given by the petitioner, petitioner enquiry is pending in CSR No.38 of 2016.

3. Under such circumstances, the Police should conduct thorough enquiry in CSR No.38 of 2016 and during enquiry, if it discloses the commission of a cognizable offence against the opposite party, respondent police shall take appropriate action and give protection to the life and limb of the petitioner.

With the above observation, this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial