N. Surendran Vs. State represented by the Superintendent of Police, Ariyalur and Others

N. Surendran vs State represented by the Superintendent of Police, Ariyalur and Others

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Decided Mar 15, 2016

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1192017

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1192017
Court: Chennai High Court
Judge: M. Jaichandren &Amp; S. Nagamuthu
Decided On: Mar 15, 2016
Case Number: H.C.P. No. 1922 of 2015
Subject: Motor Vehicles

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Motor Vehicles

Key legal issue: Motor Vehicles

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

N. Surendran

Respondent

State represented by the Superintendent of Police, Ariyalur and Others

Excerpt

.....of habeas corpus, to direct the 5th respondent to produce the minor daughter of the petitioner, namely, nandhini devi, before this court, and to set her at liberty. 2. the petitioner has stated that the detenue is the elder daughter of the petitioner. she was studying in xth standard, in the government school at vilangudi government school. on 10.12.2014, she did not return home after the school hours. therefore, the wife of the petitioner had lodged a complaint before the 3rd respondent, on 11.10.2014, suspecting that the minor girl had been kidnapped. the said complaint had been registered, in crime no.118 of 2014, for the offence under section 366(a) i.p.c. 3. today, when the matter was listed for hearing, the detenue has been produced before this court, by the 5th respondent/inspector of police, jayankondan. on enquiry, the detenue, who is in the family way, had expressed her willingness to go along with one selvi, w/o.sampath, residing at keela street, iyyan athur, ariyalur district, who is said to be her mother-in-law, and a close relation of the detenue. 4. taking into consideration, the physical condition of the detenue, namely, nandhini devi, who is in an advanced stage of pregnancy, and as it is noted from the school certificate produced before this court, that the detenue would be attaining majority, on 26.03.2016, she is permitted to go along with selvi, who is said to be her mother-in-law. 5. in such view of the matter, we do not find any reason to pass any further orders in the present habeas corpus petition. hence, the habeas corpus petition stands closed.

Full Judgment

(Prayer: Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, directing the 5^th respondent to produce the body of the petitioner's minor daughter, namely, Nandhini Devi, before this Court, and to set her at liberty.)

M. Jaichandren, J.

1. This Habeas Corpus Petition has been filed before this Court, by the father of the detenue, praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to direct the 5^th respondent to produce the minor daughter of the petitioner, namely, Nandhini Devi, before this Court, and to set her at liberty.

2. The petitioner has stated that the detenue is the elder daughter of the petitioner. She was studying in Xth standard, in the Government School at Vilangudi Government School. On 10.12.2014, she did not return home after the school hours. Therefore, the wife of the petitioner had lodged a complaint before the 3^rd respondent, on 11.10.2014, suspecting that the minor girl had been kidnapped. The said complaint had been registered, in Crime No.118 of 2014, for the offence under Section 366(A) I.P.C.

3. Today, when the matter was listed for hearing, the detenue has been produced before this Court, by the 5^th respondent/Inspector of Police, Jayankondan. On enquiry, the detenue, who is in the family way, had expressed her willingness to go along with one Selvi, W/o.Sampath, residing at Keela Street, Iyyan Athur, Ariyalur District, who is said to be her mother-in-law, and a close relation of the detenue.

4. Taking into consideration, the physical condition of the detenue, namely, Nandhini Devi, who is in an advanced stage of pregnancy, and as it is noted from the School Certificate produced before this Court, that the detenue would be attaining majority, on 26.03.2016, she is permitted to go along with Selvi, who is said to be her mother-in-law.

5. In such view of the matter, we do not find any reason to pass any further orders in the present Habeas Corpus Petition. Hence, the Habeas Corpus Petition stands closed.

Same Court & Year Chennai · 2016 Same Parties N. Surendran vs State represented by the Superintendent of Po... Same Subject Motor Vehicles Same Judge M. Jaichandren &Amp; S. Nagamuthu

Motor Vehicles writ of habeas corpus habeas corpus Has been H Res